WI Governor Walker top aid under FBI investigation

[Riot]

Originally Posted by wiphan

One question for you: did you believe or do you still believe Justice David prosser not only should have been charged in his so called attack on justice bradley but that his is in fact guilty?

Yes or no. I don't want a long drawn out answer

I already asked, do you want me to post what I said from that thread, or you do want to slink away with a final name calling, hoping nobody will notice how factually false your attack is?

Seems you chose slinking away.

Then you come back changing the subject and trying to start a new argument . Geesh, how petty are you? Can't admit when you are wrong, huh?

I suggest you go read the very long thread on the subject that already exists. Where it has already been discussed in detail and answered. If you want to re-start discussion about Prosser, maybe you could use that very thread? And don't miss the parts where I talked about Prosser not being charged. Seems you missed that, the first five times.

[wiphan]

Originally Posted by Riot

I already asked, do you want me to post what I said from that thread, or you do want to slink away with a final name calling, hoping nobody will notice how factually false your attack is?

Seems you chose slinking away.

Then you come back changing the subject and trying to start a new argument . Geesh, how petty are you? Can't admit when you are wrong, huh?

I suggest you go read the very long thread on the subject that already exists. Where it has already been discussed in detail and answered. If you want to re-start discussion about Prosser, maybe you could use that very thread? And don't miss the parts where I talked about Prosser not being charged. Seems you missed that, the first five times.

I am not as smart as you. A simple yes or no would do. Can u do that?

[Riot]

Originally Posted by wiphan

I am not as smart as you. A simple yes or no would do. Can u do that?

And I'm not as empty-headed and forgetful as you. The thread you started is convenient, go read it. And again, be sure to post the part where you were wrong

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by Riot

I already asked, do you want me to post what I said from that thread, or you do want to slink away with a final name calling, hoping nobody will notice how factually false your attack is?

Seems you chose slinking away.

Then you come back changing the subject and trying to start a new argument . Geesh, how petty are you? Can't admit when you are wrong, huh?

I suggest you go read the very long thread on the subject that already exists. Where it has already been discussed in detail and answered. If you want to re-start discussion about Prosser, maybe you could use that very thread? And don't miss the parts where I talked about Prosser not being charged. Seems you missed that, the first five times.

This is a long yes or no.

p.s.-I dont see any name calling in Wiphans question

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

This is a long yes or no.

p.s.-I dont see any name calling in Wiphans question

Wiphan accused me of something that isn't true. Wiphan knows that. That's why he's changed the subject, and is trying to distract and start a new fight

Wiphan - the thread where this was discussed in detail is readily available. If you want to know what I think of Prosser not being charged, I suggest you go re-read the pages and pages of it where it's been previously discussed. Be sure you read the whole thing, not just the parts you want to

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by Riot

Wiphan accused me of something that isn't true. Wiphan knows that. That's why he's changed the subject, and is trying to distract and start a new fight

Wiphan - the thread where this was discussed in detail is readily available. If you want to know what I think of Prosser not being charged, I suggest you go re-read the pages and pages of it where it's been previously discussed. Be sure you read the whole thing, not just the parts you want to

This isn't a court of law. He asked you a yes or no question and you didn't respond yes or no or really anyway. I mean why won't you just say yes or no?

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

This isn't a court of law. He asked you a yes or no question and you didn't respond yes or no or really anyway. I mean why won't you just say yes or no?

And I asked Wiphan to answer about his accusation against me about Prosser. I referred him back to the thread where it's discussed in depth. He's ignored that and changed the subject.

You sure jumped on that change-the-subject bandwagon fast, too What's the matter, don't want to read the old thread?

Guess that speaks for itself

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by Riot

And I asked Wiphan to answer about his accusation against me about Prosser. I referred him back to the thread where it's discussed in depth. He's ignored that and changed the subject.

You sure jumped on that change-the-subject bandwagon fast, too What's the matter, don't want to read the old thread?

Guess that speaks for itself

There is very little in life that I wouldnt rather do than read that old thread. What difference does it make if he is according to you changing the subject? Is there some sort of procedures that have to be followed?

He asked you a direct question that was related to the topic you refer to. You refuse to answer. Just because this is the political section doesn't mean you have to deflect the questions like a politician does. Why wont you just say yes or no?

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

He asked you a direct question that was related to the topic you refer to. You refuse to answer. Just because this is the political section doesn't mean you have to deflect the questions like a politician does. Why wont you just say yes or no?

I asked him a direct question first. Wiphan refused to answer. Why? Then he changed the subject and conned you into jumping on that changed-subject bandwagon.

Nice to know you have "rules" about "why don't you just answer" that you apply differently, depending upon who is doing the asking

Poor you. Stomp your feet and throw a fit, but you'll just have to re-read the thread, like Wiphan, if you want to rehash what's already been discussed to death about the Wisconsin Supreme Court.

On the other hand, Wiphan accused me of not admitting I said Prosser would be charged, and he was wasn't. Not true. You both refuse to look again at the thread where I said that. But I guess that's why Wiphan is so desperate to change the subject and make the attack about me. To get the emphasis off that nonsense. You're a good sheeple for Wiphan

If you both turn and attack me loudly enough, perhaps we can forget that Wiphan makes accusations that can't stand up to scrutiny? LOL

Geesh, you righties are pathetically transparent.

Now, on the other hand, "Walkergate" seems to be becoming more interesting day by day.

[GBBob]

Originally Posted by Riot

I already asked, do you want me to post what I said from that thread, or you do want to slink away with a final name calling, hoping nobody will notice how factually false your attack is?

Seems you chose slinking away.

Then you come back changing the subject and trying to start a new argument . Geesh, how petty are you? Can't admit when you are wrong, huh?

I suggest you go read the very long thread on the subject that already exists. Where it has already been discussed in detail and answered. If you want to re-start discussion about Prosser, maybe you could use that very thread? And don't miss the parts where I talked about Prosser not being charged. Seems you missed that, the first five times.

They are right Republicans and they are perfect. Haven't you read Dino's in depth analysis, Lord007 objective reasoning?

[Riot]

Originally Posted by GBBob

They are right Republicans and they are perfect. Haven't you read Dino's in depth analysis, Lord007 objective reasoning?

Thanks for the backup, but be careful, the shot's still flying. Don't get an accidental hit!

[Riot]

[GBBob]

Originally Posted by Riot

Thanks for the backup, but be careful, the shot's still flying. Don't get an accidental hit!

I don't f*cking care..I am a lurker here now because there are few besides Joey (JoeyDB...Not Ateam..he ain't right..sic) who can speak his peace without resorting to trash. It's all the right knows

[geeker2]

Originally Posted by GBBob

I don't f*cking care..I am a lurker here now because there are few besides Joey (JoeyDB...Not Ateam..he ain't right..sic) who can speak his peace without resorting to trash. It's all the right knows

[clyde]

Originally Posted by GBBob

They are right Republicans and they are perfect. Haven't you read Dino's in depth analysis, Lord007 objective reasoning?

Selective insulting---they're both doorknobs.



Both parties suck, let's be Dave---I mean Frank.

[wiphan]

Originally Posted by GBBob

They are right Republicans and they are perfect. Haven't you read Dino's in depth analysis, Lord007 objective reasoning?

My question was not in regards to democrats or republicans and it was a simple yes/no question. Riot simply can not answer and didn't answer the question in the previous thread. Why can't she answer the ? Yes or no that is it

[Riot]

Originally Posted by wiphan

My question was not in regards to democrats or republicans and it was a simple yes/no question. Riot simply can not answer and didn't answer the question in the previous thread. Why can't she answer the ? Yes or no that is it

Isn't this where I said, "Go ahead, please post where I "didn't answer the question" in that thread, and you slinked away whining and changing the subject the first time?

We'll give you another chance. Go ahead. Post that out of that thread. Let me get some popcorn I always love it when you righties gang together screaming you've been mistreated.