Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

View Poll Results: In the vote to raise the debt limit of the United States, I would
Vote Yes - raise the debt limit 12 37.50%
Vote No - the debt is too high already 15 46.88%
Vote Present - hey, this vote is too hard 5 15.63%
Voters: 32. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-19-2011, 12:27 PM
joeydb's Avatar
joeydb joeydb is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Southeastern PA
Posts: 3,044
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot View Post
I posted two things that refute Dell's numbers - you and Dell have just ignored it.
I think Dell's numbers are more accurate. But yes, you did counter with numbers of your own, rather than others who use an abbreviation for a crass figure of speech.

My dispute with your numbers was the "regular spending" qualifier. The total is all that matters - whether military, social, stimulus, etc is irrelevant. The total overspending drives the yearly deficit, which then accumulate into the national debt.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-19-2011, 01:19 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by joeydb View Post
I think Dell's numbers are more accurate. But yes, you did counter with numbers of your own, rather than others who use an abbreviation for a crass figure of speech.

My dispute with your numbers was the "regular spending" qualifier. The total is all that matters - whether military, social, stimulus, etc is irrelevant. The total overspending drives the yearly deficit, which then accumulate into the national debt.
My numbers didn't include what I said, above. I was using that to try to get Dell to separate it out by who incurred what debt. And they were not "created" by me.

The one set Dell posted is our national debt, separated by time. The two sets I posted is our national debt, separated by the President who incurred it. Which is the whole point, if one is going to accuse Obama of raising the national debt more than Bush W. That is simply false.

Here it is. Our political viewpoints don't matter, here is our national debt by the President that incurred it. And it has clearly been Republican Presidents from Reagan onward. Not Democratic. (and the congressional makeup is listed, too) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationa...idential_terms

Quote:
Economic commentators have noted a pattern between changes in US national debt and US presidential terms over the last few decades. These commentators observe that changes in US national debt have been correlated with the political ideology of the ruling administration.

Economist Mike Kimel notes that the last five Democratic Presidents (Clinton, Carter, LBJ, JFK, and Truman) all reduced public debt as a share of GDP, while the last four Republican Presidents (GW Bush, GHW Bush, Reagan, and Ford) all oversaw an increase in the country’s indebtedness.[1]

Economic historian J. Bradford DeLong observes a contrast not so much between Republicans and Democrats, but between Democrats and "old-style Republicans (Eisenhower and Nixon)" on one hand (decreasing debt), and "new-style Republicans" on the other (increasing debt).[2]

Similarly, Republican David Stockman, director of the Office of Management and Budget under President Ronald Reagan, as op-ed contributor to the New York Times blamed the "ideological tax-cutters" of the Reagan administration for the increase of national debt during the 1980s.[3]
I don't know why you "think" Dell's numbers are more accurate. I didn't even see a reference posted as to where he got them. My two sets were made separately, by different organizations, but both agree, both are referenced, and are CBO data.

But the point is this: the Republican meme that the GOP is "fiscally responsible", while the Democrats are "big spenders", is obviously and historically false.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts

Last edited by Riot : 05-19-2011 at 01:38 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-19-2011, 01:23 PM
Antitrust32 Antitrust32 is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ft Lauderdale
Posts: 9,413
Default

I'm still pretty bothered by that "i hope someone you know comes home in a body bag" thing.

Nascar you really should explain yourself. If you really meant that you are a pathetic excuse for a human being. just sickens me.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot View Post
Can I start just making stuff up out of thin air, too?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.