Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-01-2011, 09:59 PM
wiphan's Avatar
wiphan wiphan is offline
Woodbine
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Miller Park
Posts: 980
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot View Post
It appears the GOP thinks their legal defense only needs to be, unbelievably, "Judge,we refuse to appear in your court - so take away the restraining order until we have the time to give you some time"

The strange thing is this: the GOP could make this all go away, by simply just re-passing the bill in the legislature and the senate. So why isn't Walker doing that? Just re-vote on the bill.

The only reason could be that he no longer has the votes to pass his union-busting bill The overwhelming public anger and the recalls must have scared off GOP who would not vote the same way again.
But wait you supported the WI 14 that left the state. Isn't that ironic

There is no point in arguing with a liberal judge who has an agenda. The argument is that the judicial system has no right to be involved with the process until the law is in effect.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-02-2011, 08:09 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wiphan View Post
But wait you supported the WI 14 that left the state. Isn't that ironic
No. I think the GOP are free not to appear in court due to their legislative immunity, if that's what they want to do. I think it's a remarkably stupid path if their goal is to get this law passed quickly, and be done with it, because it's just stretching it out, especially in light of the April 5th election.

The GOP just worked against their own best interests. Duh.

Quote:
There is no point in arguing with a liberal judge who has an agenda.
LOL. Actually, she's a Republican-appointed judge who has personally donated more of her personal money to Republican candidates, and generally has a reasonably conservative viewpoint. She only became a "liberal activist" when the GOP needed her to be But it's nice of you to jump on the "defame the opposition" bandwagon for the GOP. You're doing your part in trying to divert attention from the GOP being in court for violating multiple laws, and blaming the judge.

If the GOP thought Sumi was an "activist judge", why did the GOP not have her taken off the case at the start of this? They actively declined to do this.

The GOP should buy themselves some lawyer - because the AG isn't helping them at all. The SOS saw that, and immediately got his own attorney.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts

Last edited by Riot : 04-02-2011 at 08:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.