![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm just waiting to see if It's Tricky cracks the Top 10.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
No chance. The California 3YOs are superior, it's just people like you and I who are missing out in not embracing them.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
You and your unreasonable expectations..
__________________
All ambitions are lawful except those which climb upward on the miseries or credulities of mankind. ~ Joseph Conrad A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right. ~ Thomas Paine Don't let anyone tell you that your dreams can't come true. They are only afraid that theirs won't and yours will. ~ Robert Evans The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. ~ George Orwell, 1984. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I've been following Setsuko since his G1 place at SA over Lookin at Lucky last year and felt good about him getting the distance so I bet $2 on him to win and $3 to show along with a $1 exacta saver of 5 w/1,6. I was extremely disappointed they did not take Game on Dude down but want to thank all for their input. To read the variuos opinions help ease the pain of a really tough beat.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
if a 70-1 shot would have took the favorite wide and the fav starts playing bumper cars with everyone
the 70-1 would have been taken down even if he did nothing wrong
__________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes. The game is destined to run new players off. Who usually bets 70-1 shots? Crackheads and/or new bettors. You'll keep the crackheads and lose most of the new bettors save a few that are crackheads.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
or the whole thing is just another popularity contest
__________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
I cannot fathom how people can possibly watch the replay as many times as they showed it and think GOD did not bear out BADLY into TC and cause that chain reaction.
Did you only watch the part of the race where contact was first made, and not the several seconds prior to that????????????? Un Believe Able. I think the human race is getting dumber by the day, and yesterday was a big day. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
I didn't watch the race. Santa Anita's "dirt" course sucks balls. All of the races are auto-tosses.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The stewards took an interesting view and I wonder how much Chantal pleading her case helped them take this approach. I imagine she was persuasive and said Twirling Candy initiated the contact. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Having Chantal talking to you about twirling candy would have some kind of effect. No wonder the only vote to DQ was from the female steward.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
really you get to tell them what they are seeing? how do you know the female steward wouldn't love for Chantal to whisper sweet nothings into her ear ?
__________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Mostly to annoy Indian Charlie ... here's my take on it.
First contact: (a strong brush or slight bump between TC and Setsuko) ![]() Fault: mutual (Setsuko is getting in slightly under a strong right handed whip - Twirling Candy is a tiring horse and having trouble staying straight despite Rosario's best efforts) Prior to second contact: ![]() Chantal is going left handed and is going to look to come out and do some herding - Twirling Candy is coming in a bit. Second contact: ![]() Fault: mutual between TC and Game On Dude. The latter is coming out to herd - the former is coming in a slight bit. Because Game On Dude's hind gets bumped - it will appear like he mugged TC. Basically - No one can be placed behind Twirling Candy. He was involved in mutual contact with two seperate horses. He was not fouled. The only question is - did the chain reaction bump Setsuko took through no fault of his own cost him a placing? If you believe it did - Game On Dude and Twirling Candy should both be DQ'd. Since Setsuko finished ahead of TC - you'd only be able to DQ Game on Dude and place him 2nd. Would I have DQ'd the winner? No. Would I have expected a DQ of the winner? At most tracks - yes. If you're willing to DQ the winner - you would also have to have been willing to move Setsuko up from 3rd to 1st had Twirling Candy not quit. |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
“They bumped him real hard inside and out,” jockey Joel Rosario said. Joel is gunna have to learn to ride much more defensively (on severe chalk.) I mean, the only reason to let her stay up is because they let every other jock (in the race) ride Candy, too. Normally, Victor would have given more ground for Chantal to float these two horses out (although, he doesn't have to.) She's riding Candy. Victor was riding Candy. They sandwich him, and, somehow, like 99% of the people ignore it: “They bumped him real hard inside and out,” jockey Joel Rosario said. I guess someone will have to put a still up of the sandwich. That's about the only way people are gunna take note of it. Really, the thing that's surprising me is that he is badly fouled by at least 1 horse, and the stewards have Trevor come on and say he fouled. Yea, he 50% fouled a horse who had floated him out into another horse. God forbide he take back any of the ground he earlier had taken away from him by this bitch. I know people want to beat favorites. I think he was gunna tire, but polease don't tell me they didn't sandwich that Candy Horse coming into the stretch. He's not "dead" when it happened. Was he gunna tire without being sandwiched? Probably, but it's still a foul on 1 or both of those other horses. |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Drugs, your 1st photo shows how far she's floated out into the stretch. She's not that far off the rail on the turn. Victor is where he would be (or even wider) if she hadn't pushed out. He just refuses to be pushed out by the others. Therefore, Candy sandwich. He doesn't have to give them this ground. It's assumed he will, but he is race riding the chalk. So, he participates in the sandwich of TC. That is not a foul. He is just not giving the ground they want. Her being out that wide is a foul right there. If Joel had held his ground (like he should of) there would have been a big collision between Candy n' GD. Instead, he hopes Victor gives him ground. He didn't. It appears Victor came in, because he knows he is gunna have to counter the weight of Candy coming into him. He does everything he can to avoid giving ground to the horses who are floating out. It's race riding. Her floating Candy into Setsuko is a foul (not race riding.) It's too much, and they missed it.
|
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Have they doled out punishment yet?
|
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
don't run out of ammo. |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
At 1:53 of your video pan shot feed......How far is she from the rail? When Trevor says "Setsuko is running a huge race," These 3 horses have plenty of space between themselves.
From 1:53-1:55 She taps one time lefthanded, and comes out toward you on the pan. In those 2 seconds, she has come out a lot. See the distance on drugs 1st still? That is not the distance (from the rail) that she was at on 1:53 of the pan video. At the same time, Victor decides to not float out at all. If you want to say he came in slightly, then fine. Those 2 things sandwich TC. The nice separation they had at 1:53 is totally gone. She ate that separation up by coming out from 1:53-1:55 of the pan video. That is what caused the great majority of all this contact that follows. Anyone that thinks she was straight needs to look at 1:53-1:55 of that race video. It's very reckless. It's the root of the problem yesterday. What takes place from 1:55-1:59 is the result of her coming out from 1:53-1:55. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|