Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Reload this Page ECLIPSE PHOTO: You be the judge..
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

View Poll Results: Which photo of the BC Classic finish is more award-worthy?
Photo in Post 1 65 58.04%
Photo in Post 2 26 23.21%
Can't seperate them 3 2.68%
Not impressed with either 18 16.07%
Voters: 112. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-28-2010, 01:12 PM
cantknockthehustle cantknockthehustle is offline
Sunshine Park
  
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 84
Default
How can a photography award go to a photo that was taken remotely or by using a timer? Plus, there are probably a dozen photographers that took that same exact photo.

I guess it beats the alternative, which is a jock falling of a steeplechaser.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-28-2010, 02:01 PM
cal828 cal828 is offline
Hialeah Park
  
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,070
Default
I like the second one better. The body language of each horse striving to beat the other is more dramatic.
Last edited by cal828 : 12-28-2010 at 07:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-28-2010, 02:43 PM
richard's Avatar
richard richard is offline
Hollywood Park
  
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: cheap seats
Posts: 951
Default
The first one shows the jocks too . I like the faint images of the horses in back of them as well . Plus the glaring light at the top left is not in the 1st one.
__________________
Tom Cooley photo
Reply With Quote
Reply

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Display Modes
Hybrid Mode Hybrid Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:53 PM.

Contact Us - Derby Trail Steve Byk Steve’s Notes DT Stables DT Shoppe Gallery Contact Links Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.