![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
No one is talking. Trying to find that out.
__________________
If you are not going to lead get out of the way! |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Didn't you see him?
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Not in my plans. There is enough speed signed on to discount IMO.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Even though he doesn't need the lead? Are you chucking Quality Road too?
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Chucking is strong. Not using highly
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think Haynesfield may end up being the horse a lot of people regret dismissing so quickly. I know he had it easy last time, but he still did it like a very good horse and he doesn't need the lead. I wouldn't just automatically toss the horse who won the JCGC by open lengths without at least thinking about it for a while.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
You really think Quality Road can get 10 furlongs?
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
You're not following. Randall's logic for pitching Haynesfield was the pace. So I asked if he was tossing Quality Road too, since people are generally higher on him and he's tactically similar. I prefer Haynesfield to Quality Road.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm glad I read this thread. I'm looking at Haynesfield now and starting to really like him. He had an excuse two-back when he broke through the gate, and he's getting the exact same spacing Curlin got when he won and ran arguably the best race of his life at Monmouth - race in early August, two months off and then JCGC to BC.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
It depends on whether you think Quality Road needs the lead. I don't think he does.
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ok, I get it now. I am only using two horses in that race, Lookin at Lucky and Blame, but it isn't one of my preferred betting races so I will be light within the race unless the day is going really really well.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|