![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
How long until you change your name to bernadini1985?
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is Rightly So really going to be the ML favorite? She's a real nice filly, but I will be shocked if she wins. Unless the track is as biased as it was for her Ballerina win.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I won't cry when she beats me, as I like her, but she feels like one of the biggest bet againsts on the entire card ( outside of anyone the VI likes ).
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Kind of sucks that Nicole H isn't going to get in. . . I don't know if I would've liked her--haven't looked closely enough--but she'd be an interesting wild card.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I don't like Theysken's Theory. I understand the appeal, but over time these kinds of horses are pseudo wise guy horses that just don't win. Plus, I'm not thrilled with her last race. I know it got a good rating but I'm dubious. The problem is we tend to decide the horses we have seen aren't that good, so we overrate the new faces, and these new faces are rarely real value. And the obvious, like R Heat Lightning ( funny coincidence she has almost the same name as Theysken's Theory's dam ), often pay better than they should. I haven't really done much work on the race....but I'm very dubious of Theysken's Theory.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Funny but w/o seeing the PPs yet I like her too.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|