![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I too will be be keying QR if wherever he goes in the BC. Just plain think he is the best horse out there despite the Woodward (went too slow early IMO).
__________________
don't run out of ammo. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
You will probably get 6-1 on Blame on race day anyway, if Zenyatta comes into the race undefeated.
Invasor was 7-1 in 2006 despite winning the Pimlico Special, Suburban, and Whitney throughout the year. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
One got an insane amount of hype, the other gets little to no respect. Invasor in this group would be 7/5. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
LaL? Zenyatta will be the equivalent of Bernardini, not him. And let's be real, Bernardini would eat Lookin at Lucky's lunch.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Beaten fav at CD in the Classic?
__________________
don't run out of ammo. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Maybe, but I was going for the unbeatable superhorse bandwagon. Like I said, if she were somehow equal odds as Lookin at Lucky, I'd be all over her in a head-to-head wager.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Got it. Guess it would depend the circumstances between those two. As the Classic looks right now, I would probably lean towards Lucky.
__________________
don't run out of ammo. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
As would Invasor to Blame.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Strongly disagree. Blame is a very good horse. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yeah, I get it. He beat the immortal QR.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|