8/28 (SAR): Travers Day

[cmorioles]

Originally Posted by Dahoss

Early fig was a 102. But Beyer is consulting with PG1985 later to make sure it's correct.

He might want to consult with somebody on the Travers.

[RockHardTen1985]

Originally Posted by cmorioles

He might want to consult with somebody on the Travers.

What did you get for the Travers?

[randallscott35]

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

What did you get for the Travers?

Slow. Do some work.

[cmorioles]

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

What did you get for the Travers?

I'm not sure yet, but it won't be near 105. 100 is pushing it in my opinion.

[RockHardTen1985]

Originally Posted by cmorioles

I'm not sure yet, but it won't be near 105. 100 is pushing it in my opinion.

Thanks.

[cmorioles]

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

Thanks.

It was the only route so whoever makes it, it is a guess. Looking at the pace of the race, a 105 is extremely unlikely. There are lots of ways to look at the race, and given the biased track I could see giving a 105 thinking the winner ran a new top staying on the rail.

Of course, it wouldn't be a new top if Beyer hadn't changed a 109 (something like that at least) three races back for the winner to a 101.

[randallscott35]

Originally Posted by cmorioles

It was the only route so whoever makes it, it is a guess. Looking at the pace of the race, a 105 is extremely unlikely. There are lots of ways to look at the race, and given the biased track I could see giving a 105 thinking the winner ran a new top staying on the rail.

Of course, it wouldn't be a new top if Beyer hadn't changed a 109 (something like that at least) three races back for the winner to a 101.

93 or 95. Sundial.

[cmorioles]

Originally Posted by randallscott35

93 or 95. Sundial.

How do you come up with this?