![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
What's not serious about this? Or is this a dirt-centric bias working here. Like it or not, racing today is a combination of dirt and synthetics. I have accepted it, you may tell me it is an unfair surface, but seeing a sprinter stretch out on dirt on a speed favoring surface and running like an energizer bunny, is this fair also? Is this a superior/better surface?
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Euro runners must really suck since they don't race on "real dirt"...
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quarter horse must suck since they don't race very far, and steeplechase horses must suck because they race too far.
__________________
Still trying to outsmart me, aren't you, mule-skinner? You want me to think that you don't want me to go down there, but the subtle truth is you really don't want me to go down there! |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think my point was since we have only 3-4 major dirt tracks running at the moment, the form for the classic will come down to these tracks barring the European shippers and we both know they do not race on dirt over there. Just as it was for the Classic in 09. A fact many have stated it was a watered down classic because no dirt horse could succeed over that surface. I have a question, what happens if a synth horse wins the classic? When or if it happens, will the $hit hit the fan here?
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|