![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
No I am not. And Im not happy with you, telling him you agree. I am showing a profit on pick 4's for the Spa, and Im still up off the 13-1 Ramon/Voss, Giants Causeway I hit. Thanks though. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
You took a long break from the Pk4's didn't you?
i love how some writers are still listing Steinbeck as possible for the Travers |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I took like 5 days off because I was busy with work. Not to mention, Im still not counting the Jim Dandy day early pick 4 that I hit, because I did not post it on the website. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Say, isn't that Edward Towers??
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Ya even tho he ran pretty good according to reports,hard to believe they can fly him back to NY and he is ready 11 days later.Also just read after Dutrow talked up Trickmeister for 2 weeks. Think I heard about 20 times how he was gonna beat First Dude for the lead then go wire to wire,he probably will not even run. Instead will go up against Our Dark Knight on Friday I wish trainers would just shutup and run their horse. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
What are you talking about? If anything, on paper is where he does have a shot. Who has the top beyer in this race? This guy ran an 87 first start of his career going 9f. A win that came over this track and he was wide the entire way around the track. He is not far behind the top horses on paper, and routine improvment from first-second start is always expected. Is it crazy to think a horse talented enough to run an 87 going 9f first time out can jump up to a 100 second time out? I dont think its crazy at all. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Thanks for the advice, and the inside info. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is the whole premise of this thread to prove to people that he has a chance?
Or Is this yet another thread where people disagree and you take the other side for arguments sake? It sounds like you think he has a “shot”. is your money gonna be on him Saturday, is he a horse you’re gonna use? If so why? Don’t just take the counter side of everyone’s opinion for the sake of arguing. Sure his FIRST AND ONLY race was a good one, nothing eye-popping, awesome, good for him and good for his owners. If I can recall, 90% of that field didn’t have one start under their belt, which goes without saying but it was also a maiden field? Sure he can improve, but in a lot of people’s minds its not likely you go from a maiden to being a grade 1 winner in your next start at the age of 3, at least anywhere but cali. Your on paper argument doesn’t hold much weight considering your entire basis of this horse is off 1 race… a maiden victory. 87 beyers can be had by 20K claimers at the spa, does that mean on paper they’re as good as G2 and G1 horses? Keep in mind horses also tend to bounce off big efforts as well. I, like most who have replied, think he has an uphill battle. I wont say impossible, b/c nothing Is impossible in this sport, just not likely -bt- |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Delete your pm's. I just tryed sending. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|