|
|
 |
|
|
|
#1
10-07-2006, 08:26 PM
|
||||
|
||||
I never understand why people downgrade a horse based upon his competition. The horse is only running against who shows up and he keeps hammering them. What more do you want him to do? Since his 1st race he has been winning pretty much throttled down. Not like he is winning allowance races. Does not matter who he beats if there isn't anyone out there that measures up to him. Should they try to win the race by 30 lengths? Maybe he is one of the all time greats and maybe he is not. But so far you will have a hard time convincing me that he couldn't beat St. Liam or Roses in May. He may not win eased up against better horses but to say that he would not have been competitive with decent but far from great horses like the 2 mentioned above is kind of silly.
|
|
#2
10-07-2006, 08:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
for the record i dont hate bernardini.i support anything associated with seattle slew and ap indy.honestly if he was owned by someone other than sheik mohamhead i probably feel different.
|
|
#3
10-07-2006, 08:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
One word - Officer
|
|
#4
10-07-2006, 08:40 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
In my humble opinion
With Lava having 3 weeks to get right at CD, look for a battle of the ages as the folks in charge will not let this one slip by. Trevor's call - Lava by a nose, Lava pulls away and it's Lava
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
