OK For Democrats to Have Sex with Minors

[Rupert Pupkin]

Originally Posted by Downthestretch55

Hey Rupert, leave me totally out of this...and good luck to you and those that you believe in.
I didn't resign and hide in a rehab so my lawyer could make excuses for me.
I didn't make a 100K "contribution" to the Repub party fund boss.
I didn't script any "news" stories for Fox.
I'm totally innocent. Nor am I responsible or accountable.
Though, I'm guessing that with all the spinning that's going on, somebody is.
Maybe more.
So, is the issue "age of consent"?
That's avoidance.
Blaming the "media" for reporting?
That's more avoidance.
Will answers be presented to the "real" questions be presented before the November elections?
I sure hope so, because I've always thought that the Republicans stood on "truth".
err...uh... How did we get into Iraq?
Oh! WMD, Regime change, democracy and "stable government"...
Keep believing. (notice the middle syllable).

I'm not defending Foley. I am just pointing out the hypocrisy. Like I said, it's funny how one day you say that you believe in the concept of innocent until proven guilty, but then when a republican is accused of something, you say consider them guilty immediately. You say that Foley paid this guy $100k in hush money as if this has been proven in a court of law. Yet when the police have mountains of evidence against Kieran Fallon, you say that you think he is innocent because you believe in the concept of innocent until proven guitly. What am I missing? Why would you say that Foley paid a guy $100k in hush money before it has been proven?