Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-21-2010, 10:13 PM
CSC's Avatar
CSC CSC is offline
Arlington Park
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,408
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell View Post
Uh why couldn't you compare Hank Aaron and Barry Bonds?
It's very tough to say exactly how he would have done today, players are better conditioned, workout more, use performance enhancers...ect...a clean Hank Aaron would be more in the vein of a Ken Griffey Jr. rather than a Mcguire, Sosa, or Bonds.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-21-2010, 10:21 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CSC View Post
It's very tough to say exactly how he would have done today, players are better conditioned, workout more, use performance enhancers...ect...a clean Hank Aaron would be more in the vein of a Ken Griffey Jr. rather than a Mcguire, Sosa, or Bonds.
They play under the same rules, on the same size fields, playing the same amount of games. They are easily compared especially when you factor their production against the players of the same years, i.e. how they performed against what the league average was for any particular year or set of years. Are players better conditioned or do they workout more? Sure but so do the pitchers that they face.

At least baseball players don't get to choose what pitchers they want to face and aren't afraid of crossing mountains. (except the Red Sox according to Gales)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-21-2010, 10:42 PM
CSC's Avatar
CSC CSC is offline
Arlington Park
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,408
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell View Post
They play under the same rules, on the same size fields, playing the same amount of games. They are easily compared especially when you factor their production against the players of the same years, i.e. how they performed against what the league average was for any particular year or set of years. Are players better conditioned or do they workout more? Sure but so do the pitchers that they face.

At least baseball players don't get to choose what pitchers they want to face and aren't afraid of crossing mountains. (except the Red Sox according to Gales)
The game is just different Cannon, it keeps evolving, think about it Ruth was once a pitcher in addition to being an everyday player. You could never do that in today's game.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-21-2010, 11:31 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CSC View Post
The game is just different Cannon, it keeps evolving, think about it Ruth was once a pitcher in addition to being an everyday player. You could never do that in today's game.
Babe Ruth was a pitcher first then was a position player. He didnt do them at the same time. In 1919 he pitched for 1/2 the year before becoming a position player for good. Rick Ankiel has done the same thing albeit with much less success. Of all the sports baseball is by far the closest to the same games as the years go by.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-22-2010, 08:57 AM
CSC's Avatar
CSC CSC is offline
Arlington Park
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,408
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell View Post
Babe Ruth was a pitcher first then was a position player. He didnt do them at the same time. In 1919 he pitched for 1/2 the year before becoming a position player for good. Rick Ankiel has done the same thing albeit with much less success. Of all the sports baseball is by far the closest to the same games as the years go by.
I thought I read somewhere he was slowly converted from pitcher to outfield and may have played both at one time, regardless this is an interesting point, was Roger Clemons a better pitcher Pre-HGH or Post-HGH?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-22-2010, 09:13 AM
slotdirt's Avatar
slotdirt slotdirt is offline
Atlantic City Race Course
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,894
Default

Clemens was a pretty awesome pitcher in the 80's. Whether that was performance enhanced or not is anyone's guess.
__________________
The world's foremost expert on virtually everything on the Redskins 2010 season: "Im going to go out on a limb here. I say they make the playoffs."
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-22-2010, 09:17 AM
CSC's Avatar
CSC CSC is offline
Arlington Park
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,408
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by slotdirt View Post
Clemens was a pretty awesome pitcher in the 80's. Whether that was performance enhanced or not is anyone's guess.
He was, but he was even more awesome after he bulked up. Plus I doubt he could pitch as long as he did without the help...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-22-2010, 03:13 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CSC View Post
I thought I read somewhere he was slowly converted from pitcher to outfield and may have played both at one time, regardless this is an interesting point, was Roger Clemons a better pitcher Pre-HGH or Post-HGH?
Assuming that he didnt start taking hgh before he was a Yankee, no doubt his best years were pre HGH.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-23-2010, 02:35 PM
CSC's Avatar
CSC CSC is offline
Arlington Park
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,408
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell View Post
Assuming that he didnt start taking hgh before he was a Yankee, no doubt his best years were pre HGH.
I think he was linked to a Toronto Trainer when he was with the Blue Jays, he definitely was bulkier post Boston Red Sox. The guy is also a big time azz that would rival Ben Roethlisberger.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-22-2010, 11:23 AM
Indian Charlie's Avatar
Indian Charlie Indian Charlie is offline
Goodwood
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 8,708
Default

Upon further review of the 2009 BCC, it appears that the field truly sucked ass.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-22-2010, 11:27 AM
CSC's Avatar
CSC CSC is offline
Arlington Park
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,408
Default

Upon further, further review, all fields suck in 2009 or as conveniently argued.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-22-2010, 11:29 AM
ateamstupid's Avatar
ateamstupid ateamstupid is offline
Super Mod.. and Super Fly
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 13,036
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CSC View Post
Upon further, further review, all fields suck in 2009 or as conveniently argued.
The hypocrisy of this BS is mindmelting.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-22-2010, 03:39 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HomerS View Post
Actually in 1918 he played quite a bit of outfield in addition to starting games.

Would have been HOF pitcher.
true he appeared 70 times in non pitching games

It was rumored that in 1919 he intentionally pitched poorly on occasion because he wanted to be a full time position player while the Red Sox thought he was more valuable as a pitcher.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-22-2010, 03:49 PM
Antitrust32 Antitrust32 is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ft Lauderdale
Posts: 9,413
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HomerS View Post
I used to laugh when people compared Bonds to Ruth.

Ruth was HOF material as a pitcher and was outhomering teams.
and in the "dead ball" era. If Ruth was playing today he'd be as good as he was back then (or better since parks are smaller)
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot View Post
Can I start just making stuff up out of thin air, too?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-22-2010, 04:19 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Antitrust32 View Post
and in the "dead ball" era. If Ruth was playing today he'd be as good as he was back then (or better since parks are smaller)
He didnt really play in the deadball era for the most part. But he pretty much ended it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead-ball_era
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-22-2010, 04:14 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HomerS View Post
I used to laugh when people compared Bonds to Ruth.

Ruth was HOF material as a pitcher and was outhomering teams.
Babe Ruth is so far the greatest player in his sport that it is laughable. His numbers dwarf his competition.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-22-2010, 04:26 PM
The Indomitable DrugS's Avatar
The Indomitable DrugS The Indomitable DrugS is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell View Post
Babe Ruth is so far the greatest player in his sport that it is laughable. His numbers dwarf his competition.
Have you ever looked at him before? He's fat and doesn't appear to have any black in him.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-22-2010, 03:51 PM
slotdirt's Avatar
slotdirt slotdirt is offline
Atlantic City Race Course
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,894
Default

The best part about guys like Ruth, Foxx, and in later years, Mantle, is that they went out all night, woke up the next day, and still managed to be some of the best baseball players of their eras.

Nobody beats Bobby Layne in so far as professional carousers go.
__________________
The world's foremost expert on virtually everything on the Redskins 2010 season: "Im going to go out on a limb here. I say they make the playoffs."
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-22-2010, 05:08 PM
Gaining Ground Gaining Ground is offline
Hawthorne
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 502
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HomerS View Post
Maybe I am missing the obvious here. Is the argument that Zenyetta cant be considered one of the all time great mares strictly because she has run the majority of her races on synthetics? Is that really it? And that overrules all else?
no that really isnt it. it is part of the discussion i think though. im not sure how you can ignore it.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-23-2010, 10:03 AM
Smooth Operator's Avatar
Smooth Operator Smooth Operator is offline
Gulfstream Park
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,169
Default

Cannon ... you must've backed FT for '97 HotY ... right?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.