Baffert, McAnally & Co. on Zenyatta

[ateamstupid]

Originally Posted by the_fat_man

Really? Why is it that someone REPEATEDLY comes AFTER ME and you do nothing about it? In fact, even AFTER I put him on IGGY, you feel the need to quote him, further adding fuel to the fire. I have never, in my time on this forum, gone after anyone the way people repeatedly go after me. I post my comments and I move one. You don't like me, that's fine. But I'm getting kind of tired of people repeatedly targeting me and YOU, as a moderator, doing nothing about it. If someone ****s with me, I typically put him on ignore, which I did in this case. What did you do?

At some point, you might also want to entertain the possibility that my references are not 'GAY' at all. It's more about being ZINGED than GAY. Of course, someone as POLITICALLY CORRECT as you would never consider that possibility. Huh?

You're just a BOOR, Bro.

From someone whom I can't recall making a single post in The Paddock without including an insult or sarcastic remark, this is pretty rich. You started this nonsense with your incessant baiting of Rachel Alexandra fans yesterday and today. If I let that go, along with your constant provocations and tireless homophobic "zingers," I sure as hell am not going to hogtie Gaining Ground for linking to a thread where he posted a $21.80 winner, right after you asked him to post a thread where he touted a double-digit winner. Don't challenge someone, get shown up, then come crying to me or Steve about how someone's out of line just because they made you look silly.

I don't know what's been up your ass the last few days, but you've been especially antagonistic, vulgar, and of course, unfunny, compared to your usual ray of sunshine personality. I suggest you stop getting so worked up and defensive over nothing, then maybe you won't feel so "attacked."

[CSC]

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

incessant baiting of Rachel Alexandra fans

To be fair ateamstupid, there is abit of that on both sides of the argument. I understand this since this is mostly a Pro-Rachel board. That's okay I'm a big boy and I've never once complained about the treatment here, however if I am going to be be on receiving end, it is only fair that I give some back. You should keep that in mind since it seems to me the Rachel fanclub gets away with far more liberties than the minority of dissenters namely the 3 or 4 pro-Zenyatta defenders.

[NTamm1215]

Originally Posted by CSC

To be fair ateamstupid, there is abit of that on both sides of the argument. I understand this since this is mostly a Pro-Rachel board. That's okay I'm a big boy and I've never once complained about the treatment here, however if I am going to be be on receiving end, it is only fair that I give some back. You should keep that in mind since it seems to me the Rachel fanclub gets away with far more liberties than the minority of dissenters namely the 3 or 4 pro-Zenyatta defenders.

Have you or any of the "pro-Zenyatta defenders" been banned?

If the answer is no then your last sentence is a joke. If there are more voices that does not mean that one group gets away "with far more liberties."

NT

[CSC]

Originally Posted by NTamm1215

Have you or any of the "pro-Zenyatta defenders" been banned?

If the answer is no then your last sentence is a joke. If there are more voices that does not mean that one group gets away "with far more liberties."

NT

I think I said that, being banned is not the critaria for taking liberties and you know that. Look at Couchpants posts, you don't think they cross the line at times?