OAKS NOTES: Contenders (PP's-Post #26)

[the_fat_man]

Problem with Devil May Care is that she made the last move in a multi-move race. Now, people can bet her expecting that she, once again, gets a perfect trip. Of course, the problem with that is Blind Luck is a much better closer, having demonstrated that she can close against the grain, and would eat DMC up if the race were to collapse (or otherwise).

[NTamm1215]

I think Blind Luck is going to win the Oaks rather easily.

NT

[NTamm1215]

Originally Posted by RockHardTen1985

I think your wrong.

I think her lifetime high Beyer is almost as high as yours.

NT

[ibet2win]

i think thats wrong too, Blind Luck is very good but not unbeatable. I like the vibe though that spells great odds on some other talented performers. I have never been much of a Quiet Temper fan but she scares me some as a longshot contender.

[Indian Charlie]

Bickersons.

[Gaining Ground]

Originally Posted by Indian Charlie

Bickersons.

really?

[blackthroatedwind]

I'm not so sure Bickersons ( who won't even be in the race - IC was kidding ) has less of a chance than the horse who finished second in the Ashland.

[Indian Charlie]

Originally Posted by Gaining Ground

really?

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

I'm not so sure Bickersons ( who won't even be in the race - IC was kidding ) has less of a chance than the horse who finished second in the Ashland.

I love it when people take me seriously to half seriously when I say something absurd like that.

As for the Ashland, my thoughts are that the runnerup will get way overbet coming out of that awful race, but I'm a little surprised that the only positive talk she's getting here is coming from PG1985.

Hmm, nevermind.