![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
If only he could scrounge up the maiden victory for him. By the way, was that video from me? |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Oh, and in that race you linked to, CT went the mile in 133.2. I think that was at the same meet that SS worked his 133.2 mile.
He also went 107 and change for his second lifetime win at the same meet. Does that help give you an idea of what the track was like? Then again, he was a total monster. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Looking over the PPs for AQU, I see that Bickersons recently worked a 33.4g work.
Not sure that really compares though to some of the others here. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I thought that was the following year, in 90. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
I believe Risen Star worked 32.4 before the Belmont.
Some problems with issuing even theoretical beyers for works are 1. horses start with a running start 2. timing can be less than accurate 3. there is usually more moisture in the tracks early in the morning 4. some horses are worked on medication |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Lasix Bute ClaritinD ?
__________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I agree though ... reason #2 alone is king. Imagine if you tried to make a sheet figure for a morning workout - you wouldn't know how wide they were on the turn - or if the excersize rider weighed 110lbs or 165lbs. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Found this on Google from Steve Crist's NY Times days... Quote:
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|