![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Will Santa Anita race tomorrow (2/28)? | |||
| Yes |
|
13 | 52.00% |
| No |
|
12 | 48.00% |
| Voters: 25. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
..
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
There you go! And the famed Pete Pederson the answer to the Racing Secretary question...
__________________
All ambitions are lawful except those which climb upward on the miseries or credulities of mankind. ~ Joseph Conrad A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right. ~ Thomas Paine Don't let anyone tell you that your dreams can't come true. They are only afraid that theirs won't and yours will. ~ Robert Evans The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. ~ George Orwell, 1984. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Sham has been rescheduled for March 6.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Nextdoorneighbor should get a better post when they redraw. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Don't understand why the dirt-only race fans are interested in this. How many times do you have to be told that it's a drainage problem, and not a track surface problem? How many people from Cali are complaining when AQU closes due to being a snow magnet? Lately, it's been a chalk fest at Anita. Spent $24 on the late p3 there yesterday(bull single/all/ 3rd,4th,5th favs .) Had a chance to get the $129 payoff in the last(for the Sadler newcomer,) but the chalk held me off. So, it's not like I was desperate to try beating the chalk again today. If I have a complaint about these surfaces, it's that they(for us) don't create that many carryovers. If SOCAL loses it's reputation as the p6 carryover king, then it's big trouble. I know that changing back to dirt will hurt our main track field size, but it will create more random-type results. Scuds plan (to save the very lucrative p6 king reputation) would be to have dirt with reduced racing dates. If you try to return to 5 day a week racing on dirt out here, you will see huge field size problems (much worse than the present shortages.) You need a more forgiving dirt track than the ones we had. Horses need to be able to race more often than they were racing on those old dirt tracks we had.
Last edited by SCUDSBROTHER : 02-27-2010 at 06:48 PM. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
People routinely bet races run on the synthetic, but they hate synthetic? There's no carry-over into today's card. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Well let's just wait and see and hope that they're wrong. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
I just don't see Frank rushing into a surface change because the present track works, except for the drainage. It's dollars and cents . In the bloodhorse he also mentioned he is interested in a new type of surface. Sand, dirt, and some fiber . I believe Frank is looking for some profits before any further surface changes.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
LOL....What a joke that Crystal Water Handicap was. Just let Gomez waltz. Solis may have enough nuts to breed, but their is a female brain in that head.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|