![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Those odds look like crap to me. The Giants have a better Super Bowl chance than the Jets? Really? And the Pats have an equal shot as the Saints? Did the 2009 season not happen?
The ones I saw at Football Locks make more sense across the board IMO. Arizona Cardinals +$3,000 (30 to 1) Atlanta Falcons +$3,000 (30 to 1) Baltimore Ravens +$1,500 (15 to 1) Buffalo Bills +$10,000 (100 to 1) Carolina Panthers +$4,000 (40 to 1) Chicago Bears +$4,000 (40 to 1) Cincinnati Bengals +$3,000 (30 to 1) Cleveland Browns +$10,000 (100 to 1) Dallas Cowboys +$1,200 (12 to 1) Denver Broncos +$5,000 (50 to 1) Detroit Lions +$10,000 (100 to 1) Green Bay Packers +$1,200 (12 to 1) Houston Texans +$4,000 (40 to 1) Indianapolis Colts +$600 (6 to 1) Jacksonville Jaguars +$5,000 (50 to 1) Kansas City Chiefs +$10,000 (100 to 1) Miami Dolphins +$4,000 (40 to 1) Minnesota Vikings +$1,200 (12 to 1) New England Patriots +$1,000 (10 to 1) New Orleans Saints +$800 (8 to 1) Repeat? New York Giants +$3,000 (30 to 1) New York Jets +$1,500 (15 to 1) Oakland Raiders +$10,000 (100 to 1) Philadelphia Eagles +$1,200 (12 to 1) Pittsburgh Steelers +$1,000 (10 to 1) San Diego Chargers +$800 (8 to 1) San Francisco 49ers +$4,000 (40 to 1) Seattle Seahawks +$5,000 (50 to 1) St. Louis Rams +$10,000 (100 to 1) Tampa Bay Buccaneers +$10,000 (100 to 1) Tennessee Titans +$3,000 (30 to 1) Washington Redskins +$5,000 (50 to 1) |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Odd that they have both Philly and Dallas at 12-1 after D just creamed them back-to-back.
Frankly, I think the Birds should be no better than 30-1... |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Let me guess, the a$$hole troll above me posted something about the Eagles...his life must slurp on nut hairs like spaghetti strands, being a USC fan too...
__________________
"A person who saw no important difference between the fire outside a Neandrathal's cave and a working thermo-nuclear reactor might tell you that junk bonds and derivatives BOTH serve to energize capital" - Nathan Israel |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
and Romo > McNabb. If McNabb plays next year it will be a typical year for the Eagles. McNabb will have 6 awesome games and 6 average games and 4 poor games (against teams like Oakland) and we'll go 10-6 or 11-5 and then we'll look awesome the first playoff game or so and McChoke will do his thing when it matters (choke).
__________________
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
and let's blame it ALL on McNabb. Granted, they had a cupcake schedule, but they did set many offensive records for the franchise. They looked like dog $hit the last few weeks of the year, but that can be attributed to much, much more than just 'McChoke'... and Romo is NOT> McNabb, lets be real Uncly...I'll need Romo to win more than one playoff game for your assessment to hold ANY weight. and for the blind as a bat USC knob gobbler, good ole Pete Carrol will be back in college ball in two years. I'd much rather be a Reid fan that swinging from the cock of a guy who failed MISERABLY in his stint as a pro coach and primed to fail again. Is Reid the best gameday coach? Not by any stretch, but he sure as $hit will, on his worst day, run a much better operation (organization, not family) than Carrol will on his best day.
__________________
"A person who saw no important difference between the fire outside a Neandrathal's cave and a working thermo-nuclear reactor might tell you that junk bonds and derivatives BOTH serve to energize capital" - Nathan Israel Last edited by declansharbor : 02-11-2010 at 09:29 PM. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
But McChoke gets most of the blame for the two Cowboys game.. he was TERRIBLE and inaccurate like he is in most "big" games. I'm REALLY ready for the Kevin Kolb era, and McNabb could be more help for this team if we somehow get a 1st round pick for him or trade for a solid DE(which we wont.. we'll get a 2nd or a 3rd rounder).
__________________
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|