![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I already have to prove what I'm doing here to immigration sometimes when I'm just driving through New Mexico, Arizona near the southern border.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Not government ID cards. Useless, and they can be forged (and will be).
A fingerprint database linked to the one already used for "Social Security Numbers". That's a nonintrusive answer, and quite safe from identity theft concerns. Not many people would (or can) alter their fingerprints surgically, all ten of them, perfectly. Low risk. You wouldn't have to carry a card. And the few times this passive device would be used is for security, or at a hospital, airport, buying a gun, proving you're of age at a bar, voting, etc. It would greatly simplify every current need we have for showing identification. And the illegals would have nowhere to hide their status. It's not active. It would not track your whereabouts, though I suspect they can already do that with cell phones that we all carry. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I do NOT want more government intrusion into my private life.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|