![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't think closing Aqueduct (regardless of the historical implications) will do a thing to enhance NY racing, from a business standpoint. You would simply wind up with "Calder North" and a ton of lost interest. The only legitimate option from my perspective would be to turn NYRA completely on it's head, winterize Belmont (at a ridiculous cost that could not be substantiated), and run a Spring - Fall meet at Saratoga, ala Keeneland - Chruchill.
Not going to happen. Love it or hate it, the Aqueduct winter meet is part of the history and the lore. If nothing else, it gives us a reason to look forward to the spring. I personally enjoy the meet, and also really do look forward to the first turf racing at Belmont, but not because I think Aqueduct needs to go by the wayside. It simply helps mark time as we go through the season. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
All history aside, the place really is a dive, but not any worse than another 10 or so tracks I have visited across this country...
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
When I go to a track the two most important things are can I get my bets down easily and are the restrooms relatively clean. As I get older the second is becoming more important than the first.
![]()
__________________
The man who complains about the way the ball bounces is likely the one who dropped it - Lou Holtz |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|