Jerry Brown's letter to TDN on HOY discussion

[philcski]

Originally Posted by prudery

Not exactly ...

It only stands in a kangaroo court ...

The statement will stand ONLY if it is qualified that she won a G! against males at three ONLY after races were graded post 1973 ...

The above also implies that there were NO graded races before that, or what a G1 is is totally up to conjecture--and in the case of the Rachelistas, convenience ...

OK you win. She's the first since 1945. Happy??? Who gives a sh1t about minutiae like this, she did amazing things this year and should be horse of the year.

[prudery]

Originally Posted by philcski

OK you win. She's the first since 1945. Happy??? Who gives a sh1t about minutiae like this, she did amazing things this year and should be horse of the year.

Actually I do NOT give a **** who wins ...

But if you are going to use broad statements and historical data to promote your claim, it might as well be correct ..

And from small minutae grows big myths ...