Warm THIS!

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Riot

"They" predicted a few years of far colder than normal weather back in the 1890's, too! Thank goodness science has advanced in leaps and bounds, especially in the last 30 years, hum?

and they didn't predict a 'few years' of cold in the 1970's (80 years before your moronic counterpoint) but an f'n ice age!!!!!

Oh yea Carter was President and started the EPA to rid us from foreign oil dependancy as I recall. Deep understanding you call it.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

and they didn't predict a 'few years' of cold in the 1970's (80 years before your moronic counterpoint) but an f'n ice age!!!!!

Oh yea Carter was President and started the EPA to rid us from foreign oil dependancy as I recall. Deep understanding you call it.

Nope. I never discussed Carter, the EPA, and foreign oil in relation to "deep understanding". That you keep bringing up all your little Carter hates is hilarious. I didn't vote for the guy.

[Cannon Shell]

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...p_mostpop_read

apparently the issues with the data and "science" run a bit deeper than ARiot trys to portray. Like some of the peers who review the peer reviewed studies are the same phonies who fudged the data. Among other things...

[Cannon Shell]

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...250205490.html

Another dirty little truth

[SOREHOOF]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...250205490.html

Another dirty little truth

How inconvenient.

[Danzig]

you guys did see that all the raw data that had been compiled had been destroyed? there's no way to go back and double-check the figures this group had been using-they erased all the figures.


http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle6936328.ece


SCIENTISTS at the University of East Anglia (UEA) have admitted throwing away much of the raw temperature data on which their predictions of global warming are based.

It means that other academics are not able to check basic calculations said to show a long-term rise in temperature over the past 150 years.

The UEA’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU) was forced to reveal the loss following requests for the data under Freedom of Information legislation.



The CRU is the world’s leading centre for reconstructing past climate and temperatures. Climate change sceptics have long been keen to examine exactly how its data were compiled. That is now impossible

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Danzig

you guys did see that all the raw data that had been compiled had been destroyed? there's no way to go back and double-check the figures this group had been using-they erased all the figures.


http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle6936328.ece


SCIENTISTS at the University of East Anglia (UEA) have admitted throwing away much of the raw temperature data on which their predictions of global warming are based.

It means that other academics are not able to check basic calculations said to show a long-term rise in temperature over the past 150 years.

The UEA’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU) was forced to reveal the loss following requests for the data under Freedom of Information legislation.



The CRU is the world’s leading centre for reconstructing past climate and temperatures. Climate change sceptics have long been keen to examine exactly how its data were compiled. That is now impossible

I hope you guys realize that this is talking about a limited amount of data, not "all scientific data ever" on climate change?

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...p_mostpop_read

apparently the issues with the data and "science" run a bit deeper than ARiot trys to portray. Like some of the peers who review the peer reviewed studies are the same phonies who fudged the data. Among other things...

Not really. I'm talking about the same thing you are, and it involves the same men.