11/11 ATR: The Great HOTY Debate

[parsixfarms]

Originally Posted by Kasept

Wow. "That statement" that I made was about as coldly unemotional as it could be. Not sure what alternate universe lexicon or pejorative equates what I wrote with calling someone stupid..

If we want to split hairs on definitions, fine. I don't think people like to be told that they lack the ability to reason.

[NTamm1215]

Originally Posted by parsixfarms

If we want to split hairs on definitions, fine. I don't think people like to be told that they lack the ability to reason.

So it's OK to disagree and for people from each side to posit their own opinions but they have to be sure not to be bold or overly forthright in their opinion?

NT

[parsixfarms]

Originally Posted by NTamm1215

So it's OK to disagree and for people from each side to posit their own opinions but they have to be sure not to be bold or overly forthright in their opinion?

NT

As evidenced by the "vote" on this board and many other racing sites, many think this is a close call. There's a difference between having a strong opinion and telling someone else that they reached a different conclusion because they lack the ability to think rationally.

[joeydb]

Are you calling into the show tonight?

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by parsixfarms

As evidenced by the "vote" on this board and many other racing sites, many think this is a close call. There's a difference between having a strong opinion and telling someone else that they reached a different conclusion because they lack the ability to think rationally.

where is that picture Coach posts of the crying baby?

[docicu3]

Why is it that so many people fail to take into account that recent events carry a stronger emotional significance than events or races of memories past. At times this is decades but occasionally it's weeks or months. To attach exaggerated significance to the classic compared to other Grade 1's is to by into the nonsense that the BC has the only races of significance during the year.

[randallscott35]

Originally Posted by parsixfarms

As evidenced by the "vote" on this board and many other racing sites, many think this is a close call. There's a difference between having a strong opinion and telling someone else that they reached a different conclusion because they lack the ability to think rationally.

The same people who voted for Bush in '04 after everyone knew he was a moron.

[10 pnt move up]

Originally Posted by randallscott35

The same people who voted for Bush in '04 after everyone knew he was a moron.

will those same people make the mistake and vote for Obama in 12'...just saying

[randallscott35]

Originally Posted by 10 pnt move up

will those same people make the mistake and vote for Obama in 12'...just saying

I agree.

[CSC]

Originally Posted by 10 pnt move up

will those same people make the mistake and vote for Obama in 12'...just saying

This is how smart I am I have never voted for Bush Jr. nor have I ever voted for Obama.

[kgar311]

Originally Posted by 10 pnt move up

will those same people make the mistake and vote for Obama in 12'...just saying

Who ever voted for him the first time wasn't thinking rationally

[GBBob]

Originally Posted by kgar311

Who ever voted for him the first time wasn't thinking rationally

Can't help yourself, can ya'

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by parsixfarms

As evidenced by the "vote" on this board and many other racing sites, many think this is a close call. There's a difference between having a strong opinion and telling someone else that they reached a different conclusion because they lack the ability to think rationally.

or it could be that many watch four races a year, and are aware that rachel won one of them, and zenyatta another.

[freddymo]

Originally Posted by parsixfarms

If we want to split hairs on definitions, fine. I don't think people like to be told that they lack the ability to reason.

If the shoe fits....