Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > The Steve Dellinger Discourse Den
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-10-2009, 10:27 AM
Coach Pants
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Private insurance companies should have the freedom to decide what they will offer.

Maybe then the masses will realize that it isn't the evil insurance companies who sent them a $15,000 bill for a simple outpatient surgery. And maybe, just maybe, they'll realize the real enemies are the attorneys who have crippled the doctor's and hospitals with yellow tape and fears of literal anal rape in a courtroom.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-10-2009, 11:17 AM
jms62's Avatar
jms62 jms62 is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 19,966
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach Pants
Private insurance companies should have the freedom to decide what they will offer.

Maybe then the masses will realize that it isn't the evil insurance companies who sent them a $15,000 bill for a simple outpatient surgery. And maybe, just maybe, they'll realize the real enemies are the attorneys who have crippled the doctor's and hospitals with yellow tape and fears of literal anal rape in a courtroom.


In your usual eloquent fashion you nailed it.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-10-2009, 11:53 AM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jms62


In your usual eloquent fashion you nailed it.
Then you guys will be happy that tort reform and malpractice arbitration improvements are in the House bill.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-10-2009, 12:04 PM
jms62's Avatar
jms62 jms62 is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 19,966
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot
Then you guys will be happy that tort reform and malpractice arbitration improvements are in the House bill.
43% of Congress are lawyers. To think Tort Reform will have any bite is like letting the foxes be in charge of securing the hen house.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-10-2009, 03:32 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jms62
43% of Congress are lawyers. To think Tort Reform will have any bite is like letting the foxes be in charge of securing the hen house.
The foxes have been ordering their hens not to allow any healthcare reform whatsoever.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-12-2009, 10:08 AM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot
Then you guys will be happy that tort reform and malpractice arbitration improvements are in the House bill.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...760366872.html
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-10-2009, 11:40 AM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach Pants
Private insurance companies should have the freedom to decide what they will offer.
.
Private insurance companies do exactly that. They can even take it back after they sign a contract to do so and you've paid them. They can even take it back after they have said they would pay. They can drop an insured at any time, at their whim, as there are no laws to hold them to their side of the contract. The majority of bankruptcies in America are due to insured people paying for healthcare (google, Dell, it's everywhere).

In this, the wealthiest and most generous of countries, where all are created equal, we have thousands of our citizens getting extremely ill and dying every year because they cannot get regular basic health coverage, or they are ill and their insurance company pulls the rug out from under them and they lose their savings and their house and all they worked for their entire life.

And that is why decades have been spent trying to get health care reform instituted. Thank goodness there is a real chance of that.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-10-2009, 12:45 PM
Coach Pants
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot
Private insurance companies do exactly that. They can even take it back after they sign a contract to do so and you've paid them. They can even take it back after they have said they would pay. They can drop an insured at any time, at their whim, as there are no laws to hold them to their side of the contract. The majority of bankruptcies in America are due to insured people paying for healthcare (google, Dell, it's everywhere).

In this, the wealthiest and most generous of countries, where all are created equal, we have thousands of our citizens getting extremely ill and dying every year because they cannot get regular basic health coverage, or they are ill and their insurance company pulls the rug out from under them and they lose their savings and their house and all they worked for their entire life.

And that is why decades have been spent trying to get health care reform instituted. Thank goodness there is a real chance of that.
And 75 percent of bankruptcies due to medical bills were by people who didn't have health insurance. Excuse me while I break out the world's smallest violin for you and the other liberals.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-10-2009, 03:34 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach Pants
And 75 percent of bankruptcies due to medical bills were by people who didn't have health insurance. Excuse me while I break out the world's smallest violin for you and the other liberals.
Sorry, your facts are backwards.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-10-2009, 03:49 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Does it matter to anyone that federal funds haven't been used to fund elective abortions for the last 35 years or so, and that nobody is asking the federal government to fund them now, in any of the healthcare reform provisions?

What has been introduced in the amendment from "The Family" Senator from C-street, in his self-rightous religious zeal, is trying to implement and backdoor more restrictions than the current law provides for.

Fortunately today, Sen. Boxer said she knows there are enough votes in the Senate to block it. How she's gonna manage that, I don't know.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-10-2009, 04:02 PM
Coach Pants
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot
Sorry, your facts are backwards.
One of them, yeah. 75 percent had insurance.

You, on the other hand, conveniently left out that 60 percent figure includes households with medical bills totaling more than 10 percent of family income. And only 29% cited medical bills as the main cause.

Now take away the people out of those useless statistics that had other bills outside of their mortgage, and the stupid god damn statistics are rendered useless and once again I am basically right and you are wrong.

Because lets face it if I were wrong then more than likely you would end up with a major medical problem and probably go bankrupt and die. And really I'm not that lucky.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-10-2009, 04:12 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach Pants
One of them, yeah. 75 percent had insurance.

You, on the other hand, conveniently left out that 60 percent figure includes households with medical bills totaling more than 10 percent of family income. And only 29% cited medical bills as the main cause.

Now take away the people out of those useless statistics that had other bills outside of their mortgage, and the stupid god damn statistics are rendered useless and once again I am basically right and you are wrong.

Because lets face it if I were wrong then more than likely you would end up with a major medical problem and probably go bankrupt and die. And really I'm not that lucky.
Yes, talking about 2007, medical bills totaling more than 10% of family income can bankrupt you, and it did - for 61% of 2007 bankruptcies. And 78% of those bankrupted people had health insurance, but were bankrupted anyway.

Sorry you think the statistics are useless. So proud of you, though, that you've gone from swearing and cursing at me to simply wishing I would die. I guess that means you're growing up
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-10-2009, 04:18 PM
Antitrust32 Antitrust32 is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ft Lauderdale
Posts: 9,413
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot
Yes, talking about 2007, medical bills totaling more than 10% of family income can bankrupt you, and it did - for 61% of 2007 bankruptcies. And 78% of those bankrupted people had health insurance, but were bankrupted anyway.

Sorry you think the statistics are useless. So proud of you, though, that you've gone from swearing and cursing at me to simply wishing I would die. I guess that means you're growing up

I dont want you to die or even get a cough. and i know your post wasnt directed to me.

But, before I die, I just want to hear (or see) you say (or type)

"My name is Riot, and I am a full blooded liberal."

please please please?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot View Post
Can I start just making stuff up out of thin air, too?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-10-2009, 04:21 PM
Coach Pants
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot
Yes, talking about 2007, medical bills totaling more than 10% of family income can bankrupt you, and it did - for 61% of 2007 bankruptcies. And 78% of those bankrupted people had health insurance, but were bankrupted anyway.

Sorry you think the statistics are useless. So proud of you, though, that you've gone from swearing and cursing at me to simply wishing I would die. I guess that means you're growing up
Yet those statistics conveniently leave out the fact that the majority of them lost health coverage because they couldn't pay their premiums after they realized, "Hmm maybe I should read the summary of benefits and plan for out of pocket expenses." Which, of course, most of them didn't do.

Personal responsibility be damned. The government will take care of these irresponsible dolts now.

And yeah I really wish you would just stop posting. Basically because you're a dishonest c.unt. I don't care how you stop posting.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-11-2009, 01:43 AM
Rupert Pupkin Rupert Pupkin is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot
Private insurance companies do exactly that. They can even take it back after they sign a contract to do so and you've paid them. They can even take it back after they have said they would pay. They can drop an insured at any time, at their whim, as there are no laws to hold them to their side of the contract. The majority of bankruptcies in America are due to insured people paying for healthcare (google, Dell, it's everywhere).

In this, the wealthiest and most generous of countries, where all are created equal, we have thousands of our citizens getting extremely ill and dying every year because they cannot get regular basic health coverage, or they are ill and their insurance company pulls the rug out from under them and they lose their savings and their house and all they worked for their entire life.

And that is why decades have been spent trying to get health care reform instituted. Thank goodness there is a real chance of that.
That is completely untrue. Private health insurance companies cannot drop whoever they want. If insurance companies could drop people at any time, they would probably drop anyone that needed an expensive operation. If they found out that a person had cancer and that there were going to be tens of thousands of dollars in medical bills, they would probably drop that person if they could. Insurance companies would probably drop anyone that consistently had high medical bills if they could.

They can't do that. What they can do, is drop people that lied to them about a pre-existing condition. If you get medical insurance tomorrow and you don't disclose that you have diabetes, cancer, or some other condition, then the insurance company can drop you. That is the only way they can drop you.

Here are a couple of articles that talk about these issues. Here is a quote from one article: "By law a health insurer can't drop you, provided you pay your premiums in a timely fassion."

http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache...&ct=clnk&gl=us

Here is another article about the issue. Here is a quote from the article: "A surprising number of patients have been in the middle of costly treatment for a serious disease only to have their policies canceled, sometimes even retroactively, and found themselves responsible for astronomical bills. It’s called rescission."

“It’s a secret program that if you have a serious illness … or are on costly medications, when they get the bills, they go through [your file] and look at your application … and get medical records from the last several years. And if they find an inconsistency in your application, even if it’s an honest mistake, your policy is rescinded,” says Shernoff. “It’s a very harsh punishment visited upon a lot of people.”

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20186938/

This is an example of what I was talking about. They can cancel your policy if they can prove that you failed to disclose a pre-existing condition.

Last edited by Rupert Pupkin : 11-11-2009 at 03:24 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-11-2009, 10:05 AM
GenuineRisk's Avatar
GenuineRisk GenuineRisk is offline
Atlantic City Race Course
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,986
Default

brian, going back to your earlier post about looking for information on the health care proposal(s)- I highly recommend factcheck.org for unbiased information. Here are some links I found interesting:

http://www.factcheck.org/2009/08/sev...t-health-care/

(From August; dismantles the "illegal immigrants will get free health care" claim)

http://www.factcheck.org/2009/11/clu...adillac-plans/

Addresses a misleading AFL-CIO commercial about the plan

In the end, the problem with our current system is that it's based on an insurance industry- and the problem with that is that insurance is meant to protect you against an unlikely, but expensive, occurrence (flood, fire, theft, etc). So a lot of people pay a relatively little amount of money to a company that makes money because it seldom has to pay out anything. It makes its money not on the people who do experience fire or flood or theft, but on the ones who don't. Health care is not unlikely; we're all going to need it at some point in our lives, and, to some extent, every year. So you're putting your necessity (health care) in the arms of an industry that makes its money by not providing service for a necessity.

I have reasonably good insurance, but I'm dealing with a limit on physical therapy visits, and the physical issue I'm being seen for (bum shoulder) is not clearing up. But my visit limit is up and the fact that I'm still in pain every day is not the insurance company's concern. I have a friend who spent 2 years of her life on crutches because her insurance fought her doctor on a knee replacement, claiming she was too young (she was 33). So, two years in the prime of her life, she couldn't walk, because the insurance company didn't want to pay. (Though they cheerfully shelled out for the antidepressants she was put on as a result of being almost suicidally depressed about being unable to walk.) They finally caved, but she'll never get those 2 years back.

It's gotta change. Who knows if this bill will end up being any good (the Senate can screw up a lot of stuff), but we're closer than we've been at any time before.
__________________
Gentlemen! We're burning daylight! Riders up! -Bill Murray
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-11-2009, 10:16 AM
GenuineRisk's Avatar
GenuineRisk GenuineRisk is offline
Atlantic City Race Course
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,986
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin
This is an example of what I was talking about. They can cancel your policy if they can prove that you failed to disclose a pre-existing condition.
And the insurance companies are stretching the legal laws to the limit to do this, and rewarding employees who find ways to drop clients. Here's a charming story about a woman who got dumped after a $30,000 cyst surgery on her scalp, because she hadn't reported on her original form that sometimes her back felt sore after playing soccer:

http://www.walletpop.com/blog/2009/0...-check-and-be/

In the same article a woman had her policy cancelled after an serious accident costing $150,000 because her HUSBAND had injured his back ten years before. Because, of course, that had everything to do with her accident.

And another article on it:

http://www.litigationandtrial.com/20...sian-roulette/

Fact is, these insurance companies go in AFTER you've incurred a major medical situation, and scour your records for anything, anything that they could use against you. It might not even be related to your current situation; it doesn't matter. And you can say, "But... but... technically they aren't canceling coverage" but the end result is exactly the same. You end up with bills you can't pay and the insurance company maintains their record profits. They're happy to take your money while you're healthy, but when it's time to provide service, forget it.
__________________
Gentlemen! We're burning daylight! Riders up! -Bill Murray
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-11-2009, 10:24 AM
Coach Pants
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yeah just forget about the fact that they lied on the application. It's them evil insurance companies with their record 1% profit!
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-11-2009, 11:02 AM
brianwspencer's Avatar
brianwspencer brianwspencer is offline
Atlantic City Race Course
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 4,894
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach Pants
Yeah just forget about the fact that they lied on the application. It's them evil insurance companies with their record 1% profit!
In some sense I get that -- but what about the "well, your husband beat you up once and you didn't tell us, so your domestic violence is a pre-existing condition?"

Isn't something in the middle a bit better? People have been removed from coverage because they didn't report that they had bad acne in their youth, and the insurance companies dropped them once they got cancer.

Do you not think that there's a significant enough (albeit still, a small percentage, of course) amount of evidence that many of these recissions are not, in fact, done in good faith?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-11-2009, 11:37 AM
Coach Pants
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brianwspencer
In some sense I get that -- but what about the "well, your husband beat you up once and you didn't tell us, so your domestic violence is a pre-existing condition?"

Isn't something in the middle a bit better? People have been removed from coverage because they didn't report that they had bad acne in their youth, and the insurance companies dropped them once they got cancer.

Do you not think that there's a significant enough (albeit still, a small percentage, of course) amount of evidence that many of these recissions are not, in fact, done in good faith?
Life isn't perfect. Even if the government completely socializes health care there will still be mistakes.

Plus the acne deal that Obama talked about was a half-truth. She also had a rapid heartbeat.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.