Weekend Stakes Beyers

[cakes44]

Originally Posted by kgar311

I will say one more thing about this then leave it alone.

Hindsight is 20/20 and reading what everyone has said about McPeek and what he does and how he points his horses I cannot disagree with anything here that has been said. Now that being said I only believe that backs up everything ive said about being screwed. If there is so much overwhelming evidence that this horse had a great shot of winning why did it "slip" past the person that gets paid to know this kind of stuff. Here I am a casual bettor it gets by me ok but slips by Mike B too and im the fool for not catching it?

Now i wouldnt be as mad if the horse won going by some collapsing speed or certain things happened to give the horse an advantage. BUT THIS WAS ONE OF THE MOST SENSATIONAL PERFORMANCES BY A 2YR OLD FILLY IVE EVER SEEN. For Mike to not take everything into consideration about McPeek and not know of any of the buzz going around about this horse is hard for me to fathom. I just dont believe he had no knowledge about this horse.

I thought the morning line was his prediction as to what odds the horse would go off at? What does what Mike B knows about the horse's chances have to do with this?