Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-03-2009, 09:12 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tector
No, horses lose--they are flesh and blood, not machines. I already posted Gary West's column on the subject. I guess you missed it, or "forgot".

But horses do have one advantage over humans--they don't lie and distort for their own petty purposes. So, you still have something to aspire to.

GAFL.
ooooh Gary West! The Steve Assmussen/Jess Jackson PR man. Is he already giving out excuses in case she loses?

You know what is also great about horses? When they always act like assholes we cut thier nuts off.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-03-2009, 11:11 PM
tector's Avatar
tector tector is offline
Sheepshead Bay
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,053
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
ooooh Gary West! The Steve Assmussen/Jess Jackson PR man. Is he already giving out excuses in case she loses?

You know what is also great about horses? When they always act like assholes we cut thier nuts off.
Well Haskin wrote a column today doing the same thing.

But let me see if understand:

If someone discusses now how she could easily lose, they have to listen to a dork like you mumbling your gibberish above?

But if they don't bring it up now, and she loses, proven liar/distortionist dalkhani is going to whine because they didn't raise it advance?

Do you guys routinely give each other reacharounds? Or do you limit yourselves to circle jerks like this?

Maybe you guys will get "lucky" and she'll break down--then you can feel REALLY superior to Jess Jackson. Yeah, you'll have shown him but good.

IC, there were more entertaining loons on AOL, but the concentration of true bitter losers is no less here.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-04-2009, 01:15 AM
dalakhani's Avatar
dalakhani dalakhani is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Washington dc
Posts: 5,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tector
Well Haskin wrote a column today doing the same thing.

But let me see if understand:

If someone discusses now how she could easily lose, they have to listen to a dork like you mumbling your gibberish above?

But if they don't bring it up now, and she loses, proven liar/distortionist dalkhani is going to whine because they didn't raise it advance?

Do you guys routinely give each other reacharounds? Or do you limit yourselves to circle jerks like this?

Maybe you guys will get "lucky" and she'll break down--then you can feel REALLY superior to Jess Jackson. Yeah, you'll have shown him but good.

IC, there were more entertaining loons on AOL, but the concentration of true bitter losers is no less here.
Liar/distortionist? LOL Yes, I lied about you calling Pletcher out AFTER the Travers was over. You really didnt rip into pletcher for running a short horse after the race was over after not mentioning it before hand. You doing that really isnt as Lame as i thought.

Are you happy? Can we move on? Or rather, can you just go back to aol so the adults can discuss racing again?

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-04-2009, 04:58 AM
Dunbar's Avatar
Dunbar Dunbar is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,962
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tector
Well Haskin wrote a column today doing the same thing. ...IC, there were more entertaining loons on AOL, but the concentration of true bitter losers is no less here.
My first Ignore addition in 6 months.

--Dunbar
__________________
Curlin and Hard Spun finish 1,2 in the 2007 BC Classic, demonstrating how competing in all three Triple Crown races ruins a horse for the rest of the year...see avatar
photo from REUTERS/Lucas Jackson
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-04-2009, 06:41 AM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tector
Well Haskin wrote a column today doing the same thing.

But let me see if understand:

If someone discusses now how she could easily lose, they have to listen to a dork like you mumbling your gibberish above?

But if they don't bring it up now, and she loses, proven liar/distortionist dalkhani is going to whine because they didn't raise it advance?

Do you guys routinely give each other reacharounds? Or do you limit yourselves to circle jerks like this?

Maybe you guys will get "lucky" and she'll break down--then you can feel REALLY superior to Jess Jackson. Yeah, you'll have shown him but good.

IC, there were more entertaining loons on AOL, but the concentration of true bitter losers is no less here.
So she has gone from the greatest filly ever to now she can easily lose to a 2nd rater but we are the idiots? Oh boy racing writers are cautioning us that she can lose!!!

This is the greatest logic ever. So now if she wins, you will crow about how smart you are because you knew she was truly great and Jackson is a great ambassador for the sport. However if she loses you will say that you knew about this possibility beforehand because some writers said so.

Unlike most, some of us have seen some great horses compete before. Not Smarty Jones or Curlin or Afleet Alex or whatever passes for great nowdays. And guess what? With one notable exception they all lost and no one thought less of them. Perhaps you should q2uit your insults and learn a little before running your mouth and using racing writers as your reference points.

You, my friend, may have a short shelf life around here.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.