![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
To suggest being able to run fast isn't important is laughable. And if someone can't analytically factor the circumstances of a race with how fast a horse ran ... they're simply not a very good handicapper. Quote:
That is the kind of stupidity that gets Favorite Trick voted horse of the year over Skip Away. It's the same kind of stupidity that made people insist Stardom Bound was way better than Rachel Alexandra. It's the same kind of stupidity that made bettors bet Justwhistledixie to favortisim over Rachel Alexandra in the Kentucky Oaks future pool in late March. Here I am saying Rachel Alexandra is the best 3yo in the country - male or female - back in Mid Feb. after she won the ungraded Martha Washington Stakes. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3P007YXgCvE You have a filly who was 3-for-6 as a 2yo, with just one stakes win - and just won a 50K stake against bums in her 3yo debut... Are you supposed to pretend that she's somehow not as good as Stardom Bound .. because Stardom Bound is a champion who won 5 straight Grade 1 stake races? Like that means anything at all. Rachel Alexandra's Golden Rod was unarguably the best two turn route race by a 2yo last year - male or female. In the Martha Washington, she ran 3.5 lengths faster than Eight Belles did when EB won that race by a pole the prior year. AND .. unlike Eight Belles, Rachel Alexandra came into that race off of a layoff for a trainer who's not a very good layoff trainer. But yeah, it's a disservice to Stardom Bound and her amusing 5 straight Grade 1 wins and championship .. to say that she's inferior to a horse (RA) who is unquestionably open lengths better than Eight Belles. Think this one through a little bit. By your half baked theory .. Stardom Bound and her 5 straight Grade 1's and championship in 7 lifetime races drowned Rachel Alexandra's much more modest resume through her first 7 races. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|