![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Felix Unger talking to Oscar Madison: "Your horse could finish third by 20 lengths and they still pay you? And you have been losing money for all these years?!" |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I have nothing against poly but it should be its own race on its on track. Dirt horses aren't forced to run on grass.. So why should dirt horses be forced to run on poly. If you have to have Poly races race them a different day at a different facilty.. The introduction of a unique third surface is fracturing racing further.. You not milk, you are not meat, your poly.. If Belmont or Woodbine replaces a turf course with poly/or back to dirt then you can BC all at one place.. I see know reason to force dirt horses to compete on poly. To me California really f'd up racing |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize"...Voltaire |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Of course it would be great for the game if Rachel ran in the BC (especially the classic). And the BC people should do whatever they can to get her there. But unfortunately Assmussen is the guy holding all the cards here. Maybe he is holding out for another track such as Monmouth/Meadowlands or Mountaineer to create a stakes race (like they did for Big Brown) and give him and Jackson a blank check to run her at their track BC weekend. If that doesn't materialize he could always decide to go to Santa Anita. Or then again he could just take his ball and go home, in that case everyone loses.
__________________
Felix Unger talking to Oscar Madison: "Your horse could finish third by 20 lengths and they still pay you? And you have been losing money for all these years?!" |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|