![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Last time I checked this was a horse racing board. Post your concerns about Doug's issues on contactlense.com. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I can't believe you guys are going on for this long about some crappy maiden claimer. I thought the call was good, who cares who was riding the horse that made the big move.
Enough of this childish bullsh1t.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Luke was great friends with Chuck and always made an excited call when one of his horses won. Was he not supposed to do that??? The whole premise of this thread is ridiculous.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Luke worked for Chuck? ![]() |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Phil , in all seriousness quit your whining. If you don't like it then don't participate/read this thread. Guys post cr#p all the time that I have no interest in reading...that being said I just ignore it. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
and how 'bout Pacheco today ? |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
OMGOMGOMG RACE 4!!! there was such a biased call for Rosario on the 7, he said that one 4 times and the other 4 times OMGZZZZ!
![]()
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
pure entertainment. Now if Vic changes his calls for you will you be charging him for your" Bite Me " or will that be on the house????????? |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm surprised to see a couple here seem so horrified at the alleged rudeness in stonegossards post...
Where was he rude? He had a valid opinion, stated it, and backed it up. He sure as hell doesn't need me to defend him but I will anyway cause he's right. He's knowledgeable, articulate, he's got balls and has not been disrespectful in the least. A couple of you are being drama queens and instead of being so mortally offended should go back and read the original post. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Who exactly was knocking, or rooting against, Joel Rosario in this thread?
The answer, for those of you who are confused, which appears to be the majority, is NOBODY. There's quite a double standard on this board.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't know who's a bigger tard here. Stone for being himself, or any of us for replying to him more than once.
|
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
The whole premise of this thread was debating whether it's a conflict of interest that Vic Stauffer while being the track announcer at Hollywood Park also performs work as the jockey agent for one of the jocks that ride out of Hollywood Park. I am not going to argue whether it's wrong or right because everyone here has their own opinions on the issue, but I think judging by the definition of a conflict of interest, it's clear that possessing both jobs is a conflict of interest.
Conflict of Interest by definition: A conflict of interest occurs when an individual or organization (such as a policeman, lawyer, insurance adjuster, politician, engineer, executive, director of a corporation, medical research scientist, physician, writer, editor, or any other entrusted individual or organization) has an interest that might compromise their actions. The presence of a conflict of interest is independent from the execution of impropriety. Quite clearly most here cannot read fine print, because in that statement it is clear that the issue at hand here is quite obvious. By acting as a jock's agent for Joel Rosario and the track announcer at the track he rides at, Vic has an interest(representing Rosario) that MIGHT compromise his actions as the track announcer. I am not going to get into the race call or anything else because that's been beaten like a dead horse, but to say that Vic holding both roles doesn't constitute a conflict of interest or at the very least a potential conflict of interest is horsesh!t. It's right there in the fine print and definition that holding both roles constitutes a conflict of interest. As I said, I am not going to get into whether he makes it one or not because it's not the issue at hand here. He does a great job at what he does, but yes, it certainly qualifies under definition to be a conflict of interest. |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
How are Doug's eyes today. We need an update. While your at it I think he stubbed his toe. Hurry up...start a useless thread about it. You are a clown. Drugs must be doing charity work by befriending you. |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Most of the time, I could care less what the announcer is saying, because my computer is in my living room and my wife is watching a movie and she would throw my ass out if I had the sound turned up. With that being said......until Stauffer announces during a stretch call, "WATCH OUT JOEL, THE 6 IS COMING UP THE RAIL", I am going to have to say I would care less whether he sells concessions, serves food up in the boxes or however many jobs he wants to take on. He isnt driving a tractor between races, nor is he shooting buckshot at the other horses when they are running against Rosario, he is trying to relay (especially to people who are at the track who mostly have their views obscured while the race is being run) what he interprets is going on during a race.
![]()
__________________
"Let the whiners and lazy cry about how impossible "they've" made it to win at this game." - Steve Byk |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|