The Great Republican Hope

[dalakhani]

Originally Posted by Danzig

i just read this about palin:


Palin may even have been aware of a Gallup poll released last week showing that she attracted less than 1 percent of Republicans who were asked to name the "main person who speaks for the Republican Party today."

Interesting. who did they have as number 1?

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by dalakhani

Interesting. who did they have as number 1?

they didn't say-it's actually an excerpt from the article about her complaints with letterman-her first after months of jokes from all the late nighters. the cynic in me thinks she suddenly took umbrage so she could get some p.r. surely not...

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by dalakhani

Interesting. who did they have as number 1?

http://www.gallup.com/poll/120806/li...aking-gop.aspx

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

http://www.gallup.com/poll/120806/li...aking-gop.aspx

if you're a republican, this poll should have you very worried.

Originally Posted by Danzig

if you're a republican, this poll should have you very worried.

Rush Limbaugh is making tons of money being a Republican.
Do Republicans realize he has taken their cause to make money.
He is NOT a public servant. He is an entertainer.

Anybody but him, please.

Its like the Demo's putting up Keith Olberman or Whoopie Goldberg.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by pgardn

Rush Limbaugh is making tons of money being a Republican.
Do Republicans realize he has taken their cause to make money.
He is NOT a public servant. He is an entertainer.

Anybody but him, please.

Its like the Demo's putting up Keith Olberman or Whoopie Goldberg.

i found it interesting that a bigger percentage of dems felt he was the voice of the reps than reps did.

some call him the voice, others an entertainer, i just think he's an idiot.

Originally Posted by Danzig

i found it interesting that a bigger percentage of dems felt he was the voice of the reps than reps did.

some call him the voice, others an entertainer, i just think he's an idiot.

Makes perfect sense to me.
Democrats want him to be the voice of the Republican
Party. I would if I wanted my party to have the best
chance at winning.

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Danzig

if you're a republican, this poll should have you very worried.

I'm not, but curious why? The poll was obviously written with a slant as I think it would be far more correct to say Republicans don't have a single voice they consider to be the mouthpiece of the party as 60% answered either no one, other or no oppinion. Next closest was a tie between Rush and Newt with 10% each.

Conversely Democrats are in formation and goose stepping to Obama with 67% of those polled answering the President.

Among Repubs George Bush was off the board though 5% of Dems placed him as speaker of the good guys. OK the last bit was a little slanted. LOL

The Viagra episode...
There is so much to kill him with.

Rush-Erection-Fraud.jpg

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

I'm not, but curious why? The poll was obviously written with a slant as I think it would be far more correct to say Republicans don't have a single voice they consider to be the mouthpiece of the party as 60% answered either no one, other or no oppinion. Next closest was a tie between Rush and Newt with 10% each.

Conversely Democrats are in formation and goose stepping to Obama with 67% of those polled answering the President.

Among Repubs George Bush was off the board though 5% of Dems placed him as speaker of the good guys. OK the last bit was a little slanted. LOL

why??? look at the top five vote getters. and of course obama is the top for the dems. but if you fast forward a few years to the next election, you have to be hoping as a republican that you've got a better 'lead voice' for your party, don't you? you think rush, dick cheney, gw or mccain would be a viable candidate for national office??

[gales0678]

Originally Posted by Danzig

why??? look at the top five vote getters. and of course obama is the top for the dems. but if you fast forward a few years to the next election, you have to be hoping as a republican that you've got a better 'lead voice' for your party, don't you? you think rush, dick cheney, gw or mccain would be a viable candidate for national office??

Jeb Bush could work in a few years , you can't honestly say he wouldn't have better executive leadership ability going into the White House than Obama

[dalakhani]

Originally Posted by gales0678

Jeb Bush could work in a few years , you can't honestly say he wouldn't have better executive leadership ability going into the White House than Obama

This is the highlight of the thread.

Jeb Bush. Jeb f ucking bush. LOL.

Gales, i dont care what anyone says...you are money!

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Danzig

why??? look at the top five vote getters. and of course obama is the top for the dems. but if you fast forward a few years to the next election, you have to be hoping as a republican that you've got a better 'lead voice' for your party, don't you? you think rush, dick cheney, gw or mccain would be a viable candidate for national office??

C'mon 4 years ago how many Dems would have answered Barack Obama? Someone will step up and the 60% of us who answered no one will know who when we see and hear him/her.

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

C'mon 4 years ago how many Dems would have answered Barack Obama? Someone will step up and the 60% of us who answered no one will know who when we see and hear him/her.

But I bet he/she and their spouse would have been proud of America more than once and previous to a year ago!!!!

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

C'mon 4 years ago how many Dems would have answered Barack Obama? Someone will step up and the 60% of us who answered no one will know who when we see and hear him/her.

i don't know that obama would have been a top vote getter in a poll four years ago, but he was certainly one being talked about. lol i really think sarah palin thinks she's going to make an obama-esque move in a few years.