The Dedgradation of the American Dialogue

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

Falwell brought a large amount of votes yes. Just as the parties court prominent black, hispanic, gay, jewish, etc leaders most of whom are less than stellar individuals.
When you make sweeping statements you are not being misquoted. When you say that the GOP recruits the Christian right without qualification then it is assumed that you are including the entire demographic.

Most black, hispanic, gay, jewish leaders are less than stellar individuals...

ok then.

I am trying to find the prominent gay and Jewish leaders
that are scum... Mainly because I dont know who their major spokespeople are.
So you are thinking of Jessie Jackson and
Al Sharpton. Hispanic... Alberto Gonzales?

Sweeping statements...
Jerry Falwell got a heck of a lot of right wing Christians to
vote conservative. The Republican party fully embraced Falwell.

So from this you derive that I said all Christians...
ok then again.

Just say it.
I wish my party would stay away from the social issues and
stick with the economic principles.
You can do it.

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by pgardn

Most black, hispanic, gay, jewish leaders are less than stellar individuals...

ok then.

I am trying to find the prominent gay and Jewish leaders
that are scum... Mainly because I dont know who their major spokespeople are.
So you are thinking of Jessie Jackson and
Al Sharpton. Hispanic... Alberto Gonzales?

Sweeping statements...
Jerry Falwell got a heck of a lot of right wing Christians to
vote conservative. The Republican party fully embraced Falwell.

So from this you derive that I said all Christians...
ok then again.

Just say it.
I wish my party would stay away from the social issues and
stick with the economic principles.
You can do it.

It isnt MY party. I have issues with the GOP and some of it tactics. But they are so much the lesser of two evils...

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

It isnt MY party. I have issues with the GOP and some of it tactics. But they are so much the lesser of two evils...

ok then.

I thought you were a Republican.

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by pgardn

ok then.

I thought you were a Republican.

I vote for far more Republicans than Democrats but I am not a member of the party, dont donate money or time, etc. The problem here is you cant debate ideology without being categorized.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

I vote for far more Republicans than Democrats but I am not a member of the party, dont donate money or time, etc. The problem here is you cant debate ideology without being categorized.

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

I vote for far more Republicans than Democrats but I am not a member of the party, dont donate money or time, etc. The problem here is you cant debate ideology without being categorized.


Jesus is there a liberal that actually ever responds without resorting to techincalities?

whoopsadiddle...

[dalakhani]

Originally Posted by pgardn

whoopsadiddle...

Nice catch! Nothing like finding the hypocrisy in the same thread no doubt.

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by pgardn

whoopsadiddle...

Actually the posters that are labeled liberals on this board are in fact admitted liberals except for Riot who refuses the designation.

[Riot]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

Actually the posters that are labeled liberals on this board are in fact admitted liberals except for Riot who refuses the designation.

And we all know you only have two political designations - your opinion, and everyone else who is a liberal, a damn liberal, or a stupid liberal

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

Actually the posters that are labeled liberals on this board are in fact admitted liberals except for Riot who refuses the designation.

So you do not mind being labeled conservative bordering
on reactionary.

Im joking about the reactionary part of course