|
|
 |
|
|
|
#1
05-29-2009, 09:12 PM
|
||||
|
||||
My apologies for not being on the conspiracy bandwagon. Carry on
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts 
|
|
#2
05-29-2009, 09:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
i think this is the main reason friesan fire lost (from bloodhorse, may 2nd edition):
...he (ff) hasn't shown the ability to run better than 1:13 for three-quarters in either two-turn race. (the derby 3/4 time was 1:12). and: based on the numbers, he must take a big step forward. what amazes me is that the guy who wrote that picked friesan fire to win-it seems from reading the rest of the write-up, that choice was due to the pedigree, and the fact that jones got hard spun to a runner-up finish. my reply would be that this horse is no hard spun.
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
