![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I've just never understood that, as hard as I try. I realize that people at yearling sales are buying " dreams" and can fantasize that they just bought the next Smarty Jones(until it debuts of course) but it makes no sense to me and never has. I wouldn't paint all agents with the same brush. The day that Edmund Gann met Mark Reid was indeed a lucky day for him. Mark buys off the track and purchased medgalia for the neighborhood of 350, and the grade one winning mare You for a pittance, Peace Rules, etc. Frustration is asking someone if they are interested in a filly who debuts with a solid number and decent pedigree and hearing no, and then seeing them buy a yearling for 800 grand the next week. I think that painting all agents with the same stroke is unfair. Agents have become specialized in different areas and not all buy at auctions. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
If you can find 300 grand that I ever made buying a horse at a markup, you can keep 298 grand of it and just give me two grand to play the Belmont card tomorrow. Private buying agents probably work as hard as anyone you ever met in the whole industry. Honing skills to determine what talent is, then having someone teach you residual value(thank you Mr Fox, the guy on Steves radio show lately is the guy who taught me when I was younger), then having to make a thousand phone calls that almost always end with no sale. Then you have to work hard to find clients who trust you and trainers who trust you. All for 5-10% of a deal. I see guys wearing suits at saratoga who are nothing more than guys who are guessing at pedigree getting into Limos and heading to the windows with wads of bills that would choke a horse to make bets. Must be nice. By the way, I have made offers for someone who is being accused on this thread many times. Hes had me make offers in the multimillions, multiple times, and hes never ONCE asked me to do anything wrong. Never ONCE has he asked me to pad a deal, and when i asked him if I should split a commission from a possible sale with him the first time I made an offer for him, he said no, thats your money if you get it, you earn it. Hes aces in my book. And I can only judge people based on how they have acted towards me and with me in dealings. I think all sides of the story need to be heard here before anyone judges anyone. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I think the most frusterating thing is when a horse that was recommended to LOTS of people gets passed on and then goes on to win some serious cash and G1's and like you said all of these people are buying unknown horses at auction....makes NO sense! Nice post Cunningham Racing..you're right, this business more than any other puts the biggest players (the owners) in a lot of risk. To them it is a hobby and they really should be able to trust the people who are "advisors". |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Then, after the big-shot agent has his 3 or 4 people review every horse in the sale, he consolidates the data and THEN actually goes out to check a very limited group of prospects......I know a guy who short-lists for a popular agent I won't name, and he said that this guy's grading system is SO strict that he usually will only qualify about 10% of the horses he looks at..... Buzz Chace, Demi....most of the big dogs do this....so, I guess the point is that they never actually slave over hundreds of horses searching for the jewel in the stack.....as a matter of fact, most of the horses actually come to the big buyers because the consignors will call or seek out the big money clients when they know they have something the market is going to really like.... |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|