Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-08-2006, 04:26 PM
SentToStud's Avatar
SentToStud SentToStud is offline
Arlington Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,065
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin
I don't get it. Why would your friend's father be mad at the consignor? The consignor offers him double what he paid for the horse and your friend's father gets mad? I don't get it. What am I missing. there is nothing sinister here. I don't see what the problem is. This type of thing happens all the time, even in real estate. It's not uncommon in real estate for someone to buy a property for $1 million and then get offered $1.1 million a week later.
The way I read it is the father's deal got pushed off the table by the consignor when the bigger money showed up.

Could be wrong, but that's how I read it.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-08-2006, 04:35 PM
oracle80
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SentToStud
The way I read it is the father's deal got pushed off the table by the consignor when the bigger money showed up.

Could be wrong, but that's how I read it.
Stud he can't do that. No way. Once the horse is sold at auction its the property of the buyer. Doesn't matter if they show up with a boatload of money the next day. If that consignor actaully did that he could be sued and see no way that he could win the lawsuit.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-08-2006, 04:38 PM
oracle80
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I might add that the reason people use agents in private sales and buys is time. Most owners don't have the time or the know how to watch a zillion races a day, nor do they want to. They figure if they hire someone to do it, that its worth a small percent.
By the same token agenst are often used to sell horses, especially brrodmare and sire prospects. Owners simply have too many other things going on in their lives to do that. it involves making a lot of phone calls and contracts and haggling, etc. So they just tell someone how much they want for a horse and let them do what they consider to be nuisance work for a percentage.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-08-2006, 05:12 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

The biggest problem with horse auctions lies with the autions themselves. The fact is that you do not even have to be registered to bid on a horse nor does the sales company even keep track of the bids outside of the final one. As a matter of fact the bid spotting process often leads to phantom bids being accepted such as a case where two bid spotters call out the same bidder. But in an unregulated forum that the auctions are cheating and fraud are unusually easy to accomplish.
I think its important to understand that very rarely are all bids live. Most of the time a consignor will assign a Reserve price and then have an agent bid the horse up to right below the price. So the unknowing bidder is actually not bidding against a live buyer, he is said to be bidding against the reserve. Being that you dont know what the reserve is beforehand sometimes the consignors agent will play a little russian roulette by continuing to bid past the reserve, known as running the bid up. This is a fact of life in the auction game like it or not. Often the sale is a bogus one such as when Scipion was sold at Saratoga a few years ago. Bred by Mrs. Payson, he was purchased by P. Biancone, agent. He ran and continues to run as the property of Mrs. Payson. There was no actual sale but he was showcased in the Bloodhorse as the sales topper.

All of these things and the other little issue raised by mattress mac could be eliminated if the sales companies would sell horses like art is sold, numbered, registered bidders. the bids could be tracked and recorded so when there is a problem like this there would be a record of who bid on who. Considering the fact that a billion dollar business is so unregulated it is shocking hat it has taken so long for cases like these to be unearthed. Also all agents that are given bidding privilidges should be licensed and subject to loss of license if found guilty of fraud.

But, alas it wont happen because that would decrease the price of horses therefore decreasing the profitability of those in charge of this sport, the breeders, consignors, and sales companies along with several powerful agents and trainers.

Funny thing about this business is that all the things that would make the sport (racing) healthier like dropping averages at the sales are thought to be horrific to the Lexington and Ocala crowd who really are the profiteers in this industry. Like Joel said if prices keep going up and expenses keep going up and scandals (sales and drugs) keep popping up and purses are stagnant, then how long until the bottom drops out?? Despite the press we could all get along very well without The Arabs, Coolmore and Storm Cat.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-08-2006, 05:19 PM
oracle80
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
The biggest problem with horse auctions lies with the autions themselves. The fact is that you do not even have to be registered to bid on a horse nor does the sales company even keep track of the bids outside of the final one. As a matter of fact the bid spotting process often leads to phantom bids being accepted such as a case where two bid spotters call out the same bidder. But in an unregulated forum that the auctions are cheating and fraud are unusually easy to accomplish.
I think its important to understand that very rarely are all bids live. Most of the time a consignor will assign a Reserve price and then have an agent bid the horse up to right below the price. So the unknowing bidder is actually not bidding against a live buyer, he is said to be bidding against the reserve. Being that you dont know what the reserve is beforehand sometimes the consignors agent will play a little russian roulette by continuing to bid past the reserve, known as running the bid up. This is a fact of life in the auction game like it or not. Often the sale is a bogus one such as when Scipion was sold at Saratoga a few years ago. Bred by Mrs. Payson, he was purchased by P. Biancone, agent. He ran and continues to run as the property of Mrs. Payson. There was no actual sale but he was showcased in the Bloodhorse as the sales topper.

All of these things and the other little issue raised by mattress mac could be eliminated if the sales companies would sell horses like art is sold, numbered, registered bidders. the bids could be tracked and recorded so when there is a problem like this there would be a record of who bid on who. Considering the fact that a billion dollar business is so unregulated it is shocking hat it has taken so long for cases like these to be unearthed. Also all agents that are given bidding privilidges should be licensed and subject to loss of license if found guilty of fraud.

But, alas it wont happen because that would decrease the price of horses therefore decreasing the profitability of those in charge of this sport, the breeders, consignors, and sales companies along with several powerful agents and trainers.

Funny thing about this business is that all the things that would make the sport (racing) healthier like dropping averages at the sales are thought to be horrific to the Lexington and Ocala crowd who really are the profiteers in this industry. Like Joel said if prices keep going up and expenses keep going up and scandals (sales and drugs) keep popping up and purses are stagnant, then how long until the bottom drops out?? Despite the press we could all get along very well without The Arabs, Coolmore and Storm Cat.

I get so excited at dreaming about that that I have to take a drink just to calm down.
Having the yearling market become more realistic would mean having more middle and lower levl players buying yearlings who have a shot to make it.
That would mean more horses who debut or run well early who could be bought privately at more reasonable prices.
If that ever happens agenst who buy privately off the racetrack will have a much better shot to make a great living just like the "pedigree" experts who make a ton at the sales telling people to go to 800 grand on a horse who won't ever make a quarter.
What a beautiful world it would be!!!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-08-2006, 05:25 PM
Cunningham Racing
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
The biggest problem with horse auctions lies with the autions themselves. The fact is that you do not even have to be registered to bid on a horse nor does the sales company even keep track of the bids outside of the final one. As a matter of fact the bid spotting process often leads to phantom bids being accepted such as a case where two bid spotters call out the same bidder. But in an unregulated forum that the auctions are cheating and fraud are unusually easy to accomplish.
I think its important to understand that very rarely are all bids live. Most of the time a consignor will assign a Reserve price and then have an agent bid the horse up to right below the price. So the unknowing bidder is actually not bidding against a live buyer, he is said to be bidding against the reserve. Being that you dont know what the reserve is beforehand sometimes the consignors agent will play a little russian roulette by continuing to bid past the reserve, known as running the bid up. This is a fact of life in the auction game like it or not. Often the sale is a bogus one such as when Scipion was sold at Saratoga a few years ago. Bred by Mrs. Payson, he was purchased by P. Biancone, agent. He ran and continues to run as the property of Mrs. Payson. There was no actual sale but he was showcased in the Bloodhorse as the sales topper.

All of these things and the other little issue raised by mattress mac could be eliminated if the sales companies would sell horses like art is sold, numbered, registered bidders. the bids could be tracked and recorded so when there is a problem like this there would be a record of who bid on who. Considering the fact that a billion dollar business is so unregulated it is shocking hat it has taken so long for cases like these to be unearthed. Also all agents that are given bidding privilidges should be licensed and subject to loss of license if found guilty of fraud.

But, alas it wont happen because that would decrease the price of horses therefore decreasing the profitability of those in charge of this sport, the breeders, consignors, and sales companies along with several powerful agents and trainers.

Funny thing about this business is that all the things that would make the sport (racing) healthier like dropping averages at the sales are thought to be horrific to the Lexington and Ocala crowd who really are the profiteers in this industry. Like Joel said if prices keep going up and expenses keep going up and scandals (sales and drugs) keep popping up and purses are stagnant, then how long until the bottom drops out?? Despite the press we could all get along very well without The Arabs, Coolmore and Storm Cat.
I agree with the part that the Sales Companies are not very interested in catching these people because they are profiting too when prices soar beyond the actual worth of a horse(s) - Thus, why should the sales company mandate a task force that would hurt their revenues in the short term and piss off some of their better clients (the crooked trainers and agents)?

Sales Companies need to understand that our market would be healthier in the LONG TERM if we rid the industry of this type of behavior because more new clients would enter the game and there would be more cash at the sales, which would in-turn be more profitbale for the Sales Companies....but nobody looks at the long term in this business....that is also a big downfall of this industry IMO.....
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-08-2006, 05:29 PM
Scurlogue Champ's Avatar
Scurlogue Champ Scurlogue Champ is offline
Formerly 'moodwalker'
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Louisville
Posts: 1,727
Default

The sales companies are tentative to "take sides" if you will because of exactly what you just said, Joel. I agree.

Why piss off some of your biggest clients when you can just look the other way and write in clauses in your sales agreements excusing you from all liability...

Someone does need to come to the forefront and speak up and do exactly that... Take a side. The right side.

It would seem that Keeneland would get the balls to do this sometime in the near future.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-08-2006, 06:19 PM
Cunningham Racing
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moodwalker
The sales companies are tentative to "take sides" if you will because of exactly what you just said, Joel. I agree.

Why piss off some of your biggest clients when you can just look the other way and write in clauses in your sales agreements excusing you from all liability...

Someone does need to come to the forefront and speak up and do exactly that... Take a side. The right side.

It would seem that Keeneland would get the balls to do this sometime in the near future.
There is a "Sales Integrity Task Force" there as you may know, but it is bogus and not moving forward for these very reasons...nobody wants it to......very interesting that the industry doesn't ant to get right.....shows there is as much illegitimate money being made in the sales arena as legitimate business in the sales arena if you ask me.....what a damn shame and a black eye for our sport that we can't even support the groups that are trying to make things fair....

There are ALOT of cheaters in this game, boys....
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-08-2006, 05:32 PM
Rupert Pupkin Rupert Pupkin is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
The biggest problem with horse auctions lies with the autions themselves. The fact is that you do not even have to be registered to bid on a horse nor does the sales company even keep track of the bids outside of the final one. As a matter of fact the bid spotting process often leads to phantom bids being accepted such as a case where two bid spotters call out the same bidder. But in an unregulated forum that the auctions are cheating and fraud are unusually easy to accomplish.
I think its important to understand that very rarely are all bids live. Most of the time a consignor will assign a Reserve price and then have an agent bid the horse up to right below the price. So the unknowing bidder is actually not bidding against a live buyer, he is said to be bidding against the reserve. Being that you dont know what the reserve is beforehand sometimes the consignors agent will play a little russian roulette by continuing to bid past the reserve, known as running the bid up. This is a fact of life in the auction game like it or not. Often the sale is a bogus one such as when Scipion was sold at Saratoga a few years ago. Bred by Mrs. Payson, he was purchased by P. Biancone, agent. He ran and continues to run as the property of Mrs. Payson. There was no actual sale but he was showcased in the Bloodhorse as the sales topper.

All of these things and the other little issue raised by mattress mac could be eliminated if the sales companies would sell horses like art is sold, numbered, registered bidders. the bids could be tracked and recorded so when there is a problem like this there would be a record of who bid on who. Considering the fact that a billion dollar business is so unregulated it is shocking hat it has taken so long for cases like these to be unearthed. Also all agents that are given bidding privilidges should be licensed and subject to loss of license if found guilty of fraud.

But, alas it wont happen because that would decrease the price of horses therefore decreasing the profitability of those in charge of this sport, the breeders, consignors, and sales companies along with several powerful agents and trainers.

Funny thing about this business is that all the things that would make the sport (racing) healthier like dropping averages at the sales are thought to be horrific to the Lexington and Ocala crowd who really are the profiteers in this industry. Like Joel said if prices keep going up and expenses keep going up and scandals (sales and drugs) keep popping up and purses are stagnant, then how long until the bottom drops out?? Despite the press we could all get along very well without The Arabs, Coolmore and Storm Cat.
If you are a seller and you put a reserve on a horse, you don't need to bid. The sales company will actually bid against buyers until the reserve is met. So if you are a buyer and you are bidding, sometimes you aren't even bidding against anyone. You are just bidding against the sales company, but you won't know it at the time. They are bidding against you and you think you are bidding aginst another buyer but you are not.

This isn't a secret. That's what a reserve is. If a seller tells the sales company to put a $300,000 reserve on a horse, the sales company is not allowed to sell the horse for less than $300,000. So if someone bids $200,000 and there are no other bids, the sales company has to bid $210,000. If the buyer then bids $220,000, then the sales company has to bid $230,000. They have to do this until the $300,000 reserve is met. If the sales company bids $230,000 and that is the final bid, then the horse will be listed in the results as $230,000 RNA. RNA means "reserve not attained". In a case like that, if you are a buyer you can go to the consignor after the sale and ask him how much he wants for the horse. We have bought a lot of horses like this. If we suspect that we are bidding aginst the sales company, we would stop bidding immediately and try to buy the horse after the sale.

Last edited by Rupert Pupkin : 09-08-2006 at 05:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-08-2006, 05:35 PM
SentToStud's Avatar
SentToStud SentToStud is offline
Arlington Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,065
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin
If you are a seller and you put a reserve on a horse, you don't need to bid. The sales company will actually bid against buyers until the reserve is met. So if you are a buyer and you are bidding, sometimes you aren't even bidding against anyone. You are just bidding against the sales company, but you won't know it at the time. They are bidding against you and you think you are bidding aginst another buyer but you are not.
I take that to mean an "Agent" can be acting on behalf of the seller for one horse and as a buyer's agent on another horse. If so, I do not see how anyone with any good sense would put themselves in that position.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-08-2006, 05:55 PM
Rupert Pupkin Rupert Pupkin is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SentToStud
I take that to mean an "Agent" can be acting on behalf of the seller for one horse and as a buyer's agent on another horse. If so, I do not see how anyone with any good sense would put themselves in that position.
At a sale, a seller doesn't have an agent. He has the consignor who is selling the horse for him. The consignor is really the agent. The consignors are usually not the agents buying horses for people at these same sales. The consignors are busy showing their consignment and trying to get all the horses in their consignment sold. They don't have time to be acting as agents for buyers. A buyer's trainer is often times his agent.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-08-2006, 06:00 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,943
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin
If you are a seller and you put a reserve on a horse, you don't need to bid. The sales company will actually bid against buyers until the reserve is met. So if you are a buyer and you are bidding, sometimes you aren't even bidding against anyone. You are just bidding against the sales company, but you won't know it at the time. They are bidding against you and you think you are bidding aginst another buyer but you are not.

This isn't a secret. That's what a reserve is. If a seller tells the sales company to put a $300,000 reserve on a horse, the sales company is not allowed to sell the horse for less than $300,000. So if someone bids $200,000 and there are no other bids, the sales company has to bid $210,000. If the buyer then bids $220,000, then the sales company has to bid $230,000. They have to do this until the $300,000 reserve is met. If the sales company bids $230,000 and that is the final bid, then the horse will be listed in the results as $230,000 RNA. RNA means "reserve not attained". In a case like that, if you are a buyer you can go to the consignor after the sale and ask him how much he wants for the horse. We have bought a lot of horses like this. If we suspect that we are bidding aginst the sales company, we would stop bidding immediately and try to buy the horse after the sale.
well, that explained perfectly something i had wondered about! i'd see that a horse was reserve not met, and that they then sold the horse for less than the final bid, which made no sense unless of course they only sold part of the horse.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-08-2006, 06:16 PM
Rupert Pupkin Rupert Pupkin is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig188
well, that explained perfectly something i had wondered about! i'd see that a horse was reserve not met, and that they then sold the horse for less than the final bid, which made no sense unless of course they only sold part of the horse.
The final bid is often times not even real. There's so much funny business going on that you don't know if the bids were real or not. Sometimes there is one legitimate bidder like in the previous example I gave. Let's suppose you were the legitimate bidder in the previous example. Your final bid was $220,000. you thought that you got outbid by a real person that bid $230,000. Then you go check to see who bought the horse and you see that it says $230,000 RNA(Not Sold). At that point, you realize that you were bidding aginst the reserve. In a case like that, you can go the consignor and make him an offer. The consignor knows that there were no live bids other than you. At this point, maybe you offer him $190,000 for the horse and see if he will take it.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-08-2006, 05:32 PM
sumitas sumitas is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,362
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
The biggest problem with horse auctions lies with the autions themselves. The fact is that you do not even have to be registered to bid on a horse nor does the sales company even keep track of the bids outside of the final one. As a matter of fact the bid spotting process often leads to phantom bids being accepted such as a case where two bid spotters call out the same bidder. But in an unregulated forum that the auctions are cheating and fraud are unusually easy to accomplish.
I think its important to understand that very rarely are all bids live. Most of the time a consignor will assign a Reserve price and then have an agent bid the horse up to right below the price. So the unknowing bidder is actually not bidding against a live buyer, he is said to be bidding against the reserve. Being that you dont know what the reserve is beforehand sometimes the consignors agent will play a little russian roulette by continuing to bid past the reserve, known as running the bid up. This is a fact of life in the auction game like it or not. Often the sale is a bogus one such as when Scipion was sold at Saratoga a few years ago. Bred by Mrs. Payson, he was purchased by P. Biancone, agent. He ran and continues to run as the property of Mrs. Payson. There was no actual sale but he was showcased in the Bloodhorse as the sales topper.

All of these things and the other little issue raised by mattress mac could be eliminated if the sales companies would sell horses like art is sold, numbered, registered bidders. the bids could be tracked and recorded so when there is a problem like this there would be a record of who bid on who. Considering the fact that a billion dollar business is so unregulated it is shocking hat it has taken so long for cases like these to be unearthed. Also all agents that are given bidding privilidges should be licensed and subject to loss of license if found guilty of fraud.

But, alas it wont happen because that would decrease the price of horses therefore decreasing the profitability of those in charge of this sport, the breeders, consignors, and sales companies along with several powerful agents and trainers.

Funny thing about this business is that all the things that would make the sport (racing) healthier like dropping averages at the sales are thought to be horrific to the Lexington and Ocala crowd who really are the profiteers in this industry. Like Joel said if prices keep going up and expenses keep going up and scandals (sales and drugs) keep popping up and purses are stagnant, then how long until the bottom drops out?? Despite the press we could all get along very well without The Arabs, Coolmore and Storm Cat.
good post and it rings with me. the sport needs a lot more regulation to make it legitimate. and i agree, Coolmore, the sheiks, they don't make the sport. the sport makes them.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-08-2006, 10:04 PM
Sightseek's Avatar
Sightseek Sightseek is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 11,024
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
The biggest problem with horse auctions lies with the autions themselves. The fact is that you do not even have to be registered to bid on a horse nor does the sales company even keep track of the bids outside of the final one. As a matter of fact the bid spotting process often leads to phantom bids being accepted such as a case where two bid spotters call out the same bidder. But in an unregulated forum that the auctions are cheating and fraud are unusually easy to accomplish.
I think its important to understand that very rarely are all bids live. Most of the time a consignor will assign a Reserve price and then have an agent bid the horse up to right below the price. So the unknowing bidder is actually not bidding against a live buyer, he is said to be bidding against the reserve. Being that you dont know what the reserve is beforehand sometimes the consignors agent will play a little russian roulette by continuing to bid past the reserve, known as running the bid up. This is a fact of life in the auction game like it or not. Often the sale is a bogus one such as when Scipion was sold at Saratoga a few years ago. Bred by Mrs. Payson, he was purchased by P. Biancone, agent. He ran and continues to run as the property of Mrs. Payson. There was no actual sale but he was showcased in the Bloodhorse as the sales topper.

All of these things and the other little issue raised by mattress mac could be eliminated if the sales companies would sell horses like art is sold, numbered, registered bidders. the bids could be tracked and recorded so when there is a problem like this there would be a record of who bid on who. Considering the fact that a billion dollar business is so unregulated it is shocking hat it has taken so long for cases like these to be unearthed. Also all agents that are given bidding privilidges should be licensed and subject to loss of license if found guilty of fraud.

But, alas it wont happen because that would decrease the price of horses therefore decreasing the profitability of those in charge of this sport, the breeders, consignors, and sales companies along with several powerful agents and trainers.

Funny thing about this business is that all the things that would make the sport (racing) healthier like dropping averages at the sales are thought to be horrific to the Lexington and Ocala crowd who really are the profiteers in this industry. Like Joel said if prices keep going up and expenses keep going up and scandals (sales and drugs) keep popping up and purses are stagnant, then how long until the bottom drops out?? Despite the press we could all get along very well without The Arabs, Coolmore and Storm Cat.
Excellent ideas.

I'm not sure if this is correct, but buying at auction is the only practice where 'insider trading' is allowable and everyone deep in the game is 'in the know'...I think the approach taken for selling art could indeed stop it.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-08-2006, 04:38 PM
Rupert Pupkin Rupert Pupkin is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SentToStud
The way I read it is the father's deal got pushed off the table by the consignor when the bigger money showed up.

Could be wrong, but that's how I read it.
No. He said that his friend's father bought the horse in the auction ring. Then the next day, the consignor offered the guy double for the horse. Once you buy a horse at auction, the consignor can't back out of the deal even if he is offered 10x more for the horse. The only thing he could do is ask you if you want to sell the horse back to him or to another buyer.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-08-2006, 04:42 PM
Revolution's Avatar
Revolution Revolution is offline
Hawthorne
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 524
Default

it is amazing that people are so shocked by this type of thing. all of the top people in this business cheat and lie. drugs are rampant too. horse racing is no different than baseball, cycling, track & field, football, etc. cheating and lying are in every sport where there is money. it is amazing people think these businesses are honest. if you don't cheat in some way, you will never get to the top. some honest guys have the occasional horse, but the guys consistently at the top are the best cheaters.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-08-2006, 04:47 PM
SentToStud's Avatar
SentToStud SentToStud is offline
Arlington Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,065
Default

o80, rupert, c-ham... thanks for the insights. Most of my assumptions were wrong. Goes to show to do business only with people you trust and then do so carefully. TY again.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 09-08-2006, 05:16 PM
oracle80
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SentToStud
o80, rupert, c-ham... thanks for the insights. Most of my assumptions were wrong. Goes to show to do business only with people you trust and then do so carefully. TY again.
Stud,
Lansdon is my best buddy so I don't really work for him anymore, its more like him asking me what i think about something and me being glad to do it for him.

If you are lucky you work with good people. Sanford Robbins is one of my clients and he is about the most honorable human being you could ever hope to meet. Guy does business on a handshake and his word is as good as gold.
If you are lucky you have good folks like that to work for. I couldn't tell you how pleased I was that the first grade one winner I bought was for him(he later sold some of her to IEAH, and they are great folks as well).
You don't wanna hurt people like that, you wanna do good for them. And always remember this, if you don't do any good they don't keep you around. Its the same as any other business, you don't get it done, you are done.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 09-08-2006, 05:21 PM
Scurlogue Champ's Avatar
Scurlogue Champ Scurlogue Champ is offline
Formerly 'moodwalker'
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Louisville
Posts: 1,727
Default

Quote:
And always remember this, if you don't do any good they don't keep you around. Its the same as any other business, you don't get it done, you are done.
Effing right!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.