Let's Make Things Interesting (A Proposal)

[hoovesupsideyourhead]

randle your my kind of guy....just the fact that they have to get there then win it...even money is more like it...

[Gander]

Over/Under on the amount of people who post here that can "afford" to lose a grand or fifteen hundred?

[hoovesupsideyourhead]

true gander...that not a play i would make if i had 100,000...

[randallscott35]

Originally Posted by hoovesupsideyourhead

randle your my kind of guy....just the fact that they have to get there then win it...even money is more like it...

I disagree. These are the top 3 choices. There is less than 7 weeks till the Breeders Cup. They each have only 1 start left before the race. To me this is a more than fair wager.

[Gander]

I agree with Randall. Thats a very geneorus wager. Problem is I dont think Invasor has much of a shot at all, him to me isnt much of an addition.
Another problem (much bigger one) is I'll be honest here, I cant afford to lose a grand.

[hoovesupsideyourhead]

dini if right should win it..lava isnt for me outside of cali and invasor struggled with sun king late ...all it takes is a miss step in taining or a cold and you win...pass ...

[mclem10011]

I have to say that even if I had a grand I wouldn't take any of that action, cuz your problably right! Those are all fine horses, and top contenders this years BC should be as competitive as any in history! By the way, any thoughts on the fact that Tom Durkin will not call the BC races for the first time in their history? Durkin is one of the best in the business, he will be missed at least by this fan of his terricic race calls. Trevor Denman is great and will d a great job, myself though I would have preferred Vic Stauffer, his calls really are what the excitment of the sport of kings should sound like! Love to hear anyone's thoughts on the top announcers in racing.

[Gander]

We've had numerous discussions on track announcers. There are no right/wrong answers, just personal preferences. I like Denman the best and then Durkin and I guess Stauffer. Those 3 are about it for me.

I think we can all agree on the fact that Mike Battaglia shouldnt be a track announcer

[hoovesupsideyourhead]

'gaaaaaiiining ground"...nails on a chalkboard..ech..

I can afford to lose $1500. But I wouldnt make that bet. I have no idea who is going to run. I dont know if the track will be muddy or fast etc etc. Plus I am not going to risk $1500 to win $1000. That is crazy.

[Gander]

On 2 horses much less, even though Bernardini is a superstar.
Invasor isnt much if he cant beat Sun King by more than a headbob.

[Revolution]

this is a pretty ridiculous thread. why would anyone lay $1500 to win $1000. the only horse that would make sense to wager on is bernardini. lava man and invasor are not going to beat him. give me bernardini, david junior, and electrocutionist and I will lay the $1000 to your $1000.

[Dunbar]

Originally Posted by Gander

I agree with Randall. Thats a very geneorus wager. Problem is I dont think Invasor has much of a shot at all, him to me isnt much of an addition.
Another problem (much bigger one) is I'll be honest here, I cant afford to lose a grand.

It's clearly not a "generous wager", Gander. And it's simple to prove it's a bad bet. You can do better by betting futures at BetGameday.com:

09/09/2006
17:00 Bernadini 12 to 5
Max bet to win $3000
09/09/2006
17:00 Invasor 13 to 2
Max bet to win $3000
09/09/2006
17:00 Lava Man 7 to 1
Max bet to win $3000

From those odds, you can construct a bet that will be better than giving 3-2 to Randall. I'll give an example in a few minutes.

--Dunbar

[SentToStud]

Originally Posted by randallscott35

I disagree. These are the top 3 choices. There is less than 7 weeks till the Breeders Cup. They each have only 1 start left before the race. To me this is a more than fair wager.

Chances are god one of them doesn't make the race.

I'll take the field at 7/5 for a Hondo.

You can hold my money.

The only single thing I wager anywhere near or over $1,000 on is the Under in the Pro Bowl.

Originally Posted by hoovesupsideyourhead

randle your my kind of guy....just the fact that they have to get there then win it...even money is more like it...

That is the big kicker in the deal IMO....if we can make a provision that those three horses that you mentioned have to be in the starting gate that day or the bet is null and void, then I may give you some action...

Keep this in mind, you are essentually offering .66 - 1 odds by your proposal, which is not exactly "giving away" money by any means....hell, Bernardini and Invasor (depending on how they run against each other in the JC Gold Cup) will be even-money and 7/2 or more, realsitically...and Lava Man will be around 4-1 or more IMO (early forecasts) - thus if i used $1,500 to bet these horses to WIN tactfully based on their odds, I would bet $1000 to win on Bernardini and $250 to WIN on both Invasor and Lava Man at around 4-1 - creating value with my $1,500 capital that you would win and I would be in a less risky position than you are right now having those horses in the gate GUARANTEED to me....

Plus, I think Bernardini is going to win the race anyway, so if I bet him on his nose I think I can get a price better than .66 - 1 anyway, or at least take my chances......