![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
It might be wet on Friday anyways, as you stated. Calling for an afternoon thunderstorm.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
However, as the meet developed at Keeneland it seemed to me that sitting that 'watchdog' trip going two turns is not good. If you give her a pass on the Poly race she fits underneath and her price should be rewarding. NT |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
I agree with the consensus that Rachel Alexandra is clearly the most likely winner of the Oaks, but could the hopeless Tweeter make her work more through the first 4f-6f than she has during her recent 4-race streak? RA hasn't had to run a sub :47 half in her last four races, and given that Tweeter won her last on the front end, drew the rail, and posted a very sharp work in her last, I wonder if Lukas is planning on having her battle RA early. Does the fact that the last time RA was in a race that went faster than :47 she lost mean something, or not?
Of course, RA is probably good enough that it won't matter even if that scenario does play out, but if all the money lands on RA, might Justwhistledixie be a smart play if she is something like 4/1 or 5/1? |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
At least Flying Spur ran second to RA, and at least Be Fair can figure for a share if you toss her poly race. I feel you can make money by beating both RA and JWD, or using RA and tossing JWD. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|