Turn em loose!

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

Why the hell do you believe that they are all thrown in because they're terrorists? That is moronic (no offense). Yeah, because if there's anything the Bush administration was famous for, it was meticulous war strategy.

yeah the soldiers who captured them all were directly linked to Bush in the oval office. And remind me again about who seemed to come out ahead in that war? Did we lose?

Tell me why exactly were the people thrown in Guantanamo put there? Bush people were looking to run up theri frequent flyer miles so they just grabbed every funny looking Abdul off the street? You do know that everyone in prison is innocent dont you? Just ask them.

[ateamstupid]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

yeah the soldiers who captured them all were directly linked to Bush in the oval office. And remind me again about who seemed to come out ahead in that war? Did we lose?

Is this a trick question?

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

Is this a trick question?

Uh are we in charge.

[ateamstupid]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

Uh are we in charge.

This has to be like your "Jets suck" baiting posts. I know you're not this retarded.

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

This has to be like your "Jets suck" baiting posts. I know you're not this retarded.

Jesus Joey, We are in charge, the govt there is the one that we installed, there is very little violence against us now. What do you call that? A loss?


http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/02/18/git...ees/index.html
Here is some more on the situation. From an "approved" source.

[ateamstupid]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

Jesus Joey, We are in charge, the govt there is the one that we installed, there is very little violence against us now. What do you call that? A loss?


http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/02/18/git...ees/index.html
Here is some more on the situation. From an "approved" source.

We've spent $2 trillion, we're less safe, we accomplished nothing, we've sent 5,000 of our soldiers to their graves, injured thousands more, killed 100,000+ civilians, and this is winning? Pass the evaluation sheet back Kissinger. Look up "pyrrhic victory", it'll describe your great triumph that our soldiers aren't getting killed by the hundreds anymore.

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

We've spent $2 trillion, we're less safe, we accomplished nothing, we've sent 5,000 of our soldiers to their graves, injured thousands more, killed 100,000+ civilians, and this is winning? Pass the evaluation sheet back Kissinger. Look up "pyrrhic victory", it'll describe your great triumph that our soldiers aren't getting killed by the hundreds anymore.

Look up Vietnam and tell me that we havent won. No one said that it is pretty. But the war strategy especially the troop surge was successful.
No one said it was a great victory but it wasnt a loss or poor war strategy. Poor post war strategy no doubt. there is a difference.

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

We've spent $2 trillion, we're less safe, we accomplished nothing, we've sent 5,000 of our soldiers to their graves, injured thousands more, killed 100,000+ civilians, and this is winning? Pass the evaluation sheet back Kissinger. Look up "pyrrhic victory", it'll describe your great triumph that our soldiers aren't getting killed by the hundreds anymore.

The troop casualties are miniscule compared to prior wars.

Now I'll help you with your liberal agenda...

Talk about the soldiers coming back with real f.ucked up injuries.

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

Jesus Joey, We are in charge, the govt there is the one that we installed, there is very little violence against us now.

We are in charge of Afghanistan?
There is a government there?

There is a government in Kabul... not Afghanistan.

No one is in charge of that country.

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by pgardn

We are in charge of Afghanistan?
There is a government there?

There is a government in Kabul... not Afghanistan.

No one is in charge of that country.

Iraq

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

This has to be like your "Jets suck" baiting posts. I know you're not this retarded.

And the Jets do suck. Even you are dumb enough not to believe that!

I don't care if we let them all go or not. I think we should leave it up to the people of New York City to decide if they should be freed or not. Like I give a f.uck if that place is turned into a sheet of glass.

[Payson Dave]

A Centrist wants to promote what is best for society, tolerate what is good enough, and prevent what is harmful.

Conservatives want to promote what is best for society, and prevent everything else.

Liberals want to promote all options (except the truly dangerous ones) as equally good.

If your first reaction to this is, “Who is to say what is best?” you are a probably a liberal.

If your first reaction to this is, “Why settle for mediocrity?” you are probably a conservative.

If this bell-curve picture of the social options seems reasonable to you, and you have no principled objection to making discriminating judgments – welcome to the center. ...



Beau Weston

[Cannon Shell]

From the last link posted:


The 17 men are Uighurs, an ethnic group from western China. They are accused of receiving weapons and military training in Afghanistan.

Some of the detainees have been cleared for release since 2003, but the United States will not send them back to their homeland because of concern they would be tortured by Chinese authorities.


of course WE should take them in right? Too bad for the Uighurs but I for one dont want them released in our country.

...and hell, if the New Yorkers want them to be freed then leave Madoff on house arrest in the penthouse.

two birds one stone whatnot deal.