|
|
 |
|
|
|
#1
02-19-2009, 11:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Sharpton. Does that mean I am supposed to call you Hitler? Or Sgt. Schultz? 
|
|
#2
02-19-2009, 11:20 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
We're talking about a cartoon.......Schultz, definately!
|
|
#3
02-19-2009, 11:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Why should the cops look like "uh oh"? And killing the chimp stimulus writer on the street. I find that an interesting way to do this. Or you see nahting?
|
|
#4
02-19-2009, 11:34 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
..and I never look at the political stuff as "art", if ya know what I mean...
|
|
#5
02-19-2009, 11:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I remember the glory days when DRF had a great cartoonist that made you want to buy the print edition even if you had the online PPs already. Then they fired him. Maybe they'll fire Andy Beyer and his figures next to ensure their total downfall.
|
|
#6
02-19-2009, 11:38 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
...they usually get rid of the good stuff
|
|
#7
02-19-2009, 11:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
an apparent error, not that long ago. ONe cop standing by very close by and watching. We had a pet chimp go wild in Conn. and get shot on Monday. By police. Cartoon. We got a scene on a street with two white goofy looking cops doing the shooting and looking shocked. We got a chimp. And then we throw in the idea of killing the stimulus. And the chimp wrote the bill. There are lots of ways to look at this and I personally I think it was meant to be blurry and explained in a number of ways. If the intent was just to accidentally get rid of an idea that was written by fool(s)- the chimp, using some other side stories... it is an odd way to portray this. This just does not pop on to a page without any forethought. Last edited by pgardn : 02-20-2009 at 12:34 AM.
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
