ahh..the good ole days..

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by Danzig

i think so too...
by the same token, we can't torture prisoners and then take offense when they treat our men and women in a similar manner. that is not to say that we should put enemy combatants up in a hilton garden inn either.

LOL we are nothing like them.

If they treated us in a similar manner... we wouldnt be at war to begin with. I dont think ANY United States citizens would have been flying airplanes into buildings in Pakistan or Afghanistan.

I wish they treated our soldiers in a similar manner.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

LOL we are nothing like them.

If they treated us in a similar manner... we wouldnt be at war to begin with. I dont think ANY United States citizens would have been flying airplanes into buildings in Pakistan or Afghanistan.

I wish they treated our soldiers in a similar manner.

you do know that we staged a ground attack,inside pakistan,last fall? without their govt's knowledge or permissions beforehand? that 20 civilians were killed?
certainly not an attack like we experienced, but that's one hell of a way to treat our supposed allies. i'm sure we garnered good will from their populace by doing that. no doubt they're falling over themselves to give us more of a hand with our war on terror.

[Antitrust32]

Originally Posted by Danzig

you do know that we staged a ground attack,inside pakistan,last fall? without their govt's knowledge or permissions beforehand? that 20 civilians were killed?
certainly not an attack like we experienced, but that's one hell of a way to treat our supposed allies. i'm sure we garnered good will from their populace by doing that. no doubt they're falling over themselves to give us more of a hand with our war on terror.

We are going after Al Queda members who live in Pakistan. Obama has been doing that ever since he was elected. It is where the fighting should have been in the first place. Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Pakistan has really done wonders for the war on terror considering most of Al Queda stays in the mountains of the Pakistan, and Pakistan just allowed the Taliban to govern an area of the country.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by Antitrust32

We are going after Al Queda members who live in Pakistan. Obama has been doing that ever since he was elected. It is where the fighting should have been in the first place. Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Pakistan has really done wonders for the war on terror considering most of Al Queda stays in the mountains of the Pakistan, and Pakistan just allowed the Taliban to govern an area of the country.

i know-i wrote my u.s. senator, and later this evening (just got home) i'm going to write the u.n.!

pakistan has been no help at all. all we can really hope to do (imo) is keep them out of here. if pakistan wants to live that way, more power to them. but they'll find they have made a deal with the devil, as the taliban will only pull similar action elsewhere, until the whole country is under islamic law.

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by Danzig

i know-i wrote my u.s. senator, and later this evening (just got home) i'm going to write the u.n.!

pakistan has been no help at all. all we can really hope to do (imo) is keep them out of here. if pakistan wants to live that way, more power to them. but they'll find they have made a deal with the devil, as the taliban will only pull similar action elsewhere, until the whole country is under islamic law.

Pakistan has nukes. We need to do a little more than hope they deal with the taliban.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

Pakistan has nukes. We need to do a little more than hope they deal with the taliban.

you're right, which is why i don't understand their move to placate the taliban, and let them have what they wanted in the swat valley region.

[hi_im_god]

Originally Posted by Danzig

you're right, which is why i don't understand their move to placate the taliban, and let them have what they wanted in the swat valley region.

the "taliban" is a name we attach to a broad range of fundamentalist islamic fighter's in pakistan and afghanistan. many of which have conflicts with other groups we also identify as "taliban".

what the pakistani's are doing is actually (and finally) sort of subtle and smart. they're trying to split off the "taliban" in the swat from the other "taliban" in the northwest territory's.

this is after 15,000 pakistani troops managed to alienate most of the populace in the swat by random shelling of village's to combat about 3,000 "taliban".

we used to imagine a monolithic "communist" conspiracy and so fumbled any chance to exploit the obvious fracture's between russia and china.

we can repeat that error or actually learn from a prior mistake.

there is no "taliban" in the same sense there's a "pakistan". they're decentralized and exploiting that is what we want the pakistani's to do.

versus random shelling. which is what really stupid people would do.

[The Indomitable DrugS]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

Pakistan has nukes. We need to do a little more than hope they deal with the taliban.

Good.

But Pakistan's problem ought not be the US taxpayers financial burden.

We've proved our point and wasted enough money there. It's time to get out. It's time we get out of there and prop up some pile of dung warlords to keep the Taliban busy.

Obviously we're never going to have the slightest bit of social influence over there - and we sure as hell ain't taking over the country.

[Antitrust32]

we need to send the crips the the bloods over to afghanistan and pakistan and fight gang violence with gang violence!!

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS

Good.

But Pakistan's problem ought not be the US taxpayers financial burden.

We've proved our point and wasted enough money there. It's time to get out. It's time we get out of there and prop up some pile of dung warlords to keep the Taliban busy.

Obviously we're never going to have the slightest bit of social influence over there - and we sure as hell ain't taking over the country.

who would want to? I think this may be evidence all people are not created equal.
Many visitors to Islamic Paradises are often taken aback when they observe the horrifying hygienic condition in these countries, either in public places, or in the privacy of its Islamic citizens. For example, in Islamic countries such as Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sudan, Nigeria, Mauritania…and so on, people often spit anywhere they like; urinate and defecate in public places, whenever opportunity permits, oblivious to the fact that human saliva and excrement are potential carriers of deadly germs and viruses. In many Islamic Paradises, public places, such as parks, recreation centres, sports facilities etc., are often littered with obnoxious objects including human faeces. The open sewers on both sides of the road, the raw sewage‑infested railway tracks, the dirt, and litter in uncultivated or unoccupied spaces often produce revulsion to any visitors who dare to experience such horrible unhygienic conditions in many Islamic Paradises

Not only that Muhammad had poor personal hygiene habits, he also recommended many of his followers to resort to extremely dirty, unhealthy, and repulsive acts.
A fasting person often develops terrible stench in his mouth. In Islam, it is considered quite a healthy habit to possess such a bad breath when a Muslim is fasting. A hadis is Sahih Bukhari (7.72.811) states that the smell of the mouth of a fasting person is better to Allah than the smell of musk. This means that a Muslim is not obliged to resort to good oral hygiene during the month of Ramadan. This also means that other people will get reward for smelling the bad odour of a fasting Muslim.

Another incredible hadis in Sunaan Abu Dawud (1.0067) states that water polluted by dead dogs, menstruating clothes and excrement of people is suitable for use for anything.

Now go enjoy breakfast!

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by Danzig

you do know that we staged a ground attack,inside pakistan,last fall? without their govt's knowledge or permissions beforehand? that 20 civilians were killed?
certainly not an attack like we experienced, but that's one hell of a way to treat our supposed allies. i'm sure we garnered good will from their populace by doing that. no doubt they're falling over themselves to give us more of a hand with our war on terror.

And you know without a doubt that
1. The Paki govt did not know
2. that the civilians killed were killed by americans or even were civilians?
3. The population isnt going to be against us regardless of what we do?
4. The billions of aid we give them isnt enough?

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

And you know without a doubt that
1. The Paki govt did not know
2. that the civilians killed were killed by americans or even were civilians?
3. The population isnt going to be against us regardless of what we do?
4. The billions of aid we give them isnt enough?

without a doubt?

1-no
2-no
3-we might not ever be bestest buddies, but news like that doesn't help
4-i don't think we should give anyone foreign aid with the hope we are getting something in return. i think we should offer future aid IF they meet certain criteria first, which is what i wrote to my senator., they don't meet the criteria, they don't get the money. i don't think u.s. citizens who believe in equal rights for all should be footing the bill for countries who think half the population is less than human, undeserving of education, and shouldn't leave the house unless completely covered with only their eyes showing. there's a cleric in iraq who wants even one of the eyeholes covered! it's ridiculous.

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Danzig

without a doubt?

1-no
2-no
3-we might not ever be bestest buddies, but news like that doesn't help
4-i don't think we should give anyone foreign aid with the hope we are getting something in return. i think we should offer future aid IF they meet certain criteria first, which is what i wrote to my senator., they don't meet the criteria, they don't get the money. i don't think u.s. citizens who believe in equal rights for all should be footing the bill for countries who think half the population is less than human, undeserving of education, and shouldn't leave the house unless completely covered with only their eyes showing. there's a cleric in iraq who wants even one of the eyeholes covered! it's ridiculous.

ie India?

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by dellinger63

ie India?

thinking of pakistan in this instance, altho there are plenty of other countries who think women are on par with animals, or just another piece of property. and of course some areas of india still engage in pitching the widow on the funeral pyre of the dead husband, along with all his other 'goods'. pakistan announced a couple of days ago that an area of pakistan will be under islamic law-the newspaper called it a 'particularly harsh' version of islamic law-with women being pretty much stuck at home, girls unable to even go to school. they got tired of fighting militants in the area, so i guess the govt there feels this is the solution to the violence. no doubt it will only embolden those militants to try the same thing elsewhere in pakistan...if they play their cards just right, it will be islam as the law of the land country-wide.
and of course our enlightened ally, saudi arabia, still requires women to have a close male relative escort them any time they leave home-and they're not allowed to drive cars either. a cleric said a woman alone was on par with putting an open can of cat food out in the alley-that one would expect the cats in the neighborhood to immediately come and devour the food-it's their nature to act in that way. so, in his thinking, men can't help themselves either-if a woman there is raped, she's punished along with her attacker, as she must have been 'asking' for it. a man, like a cat, can't help his base nature.
but i digress....

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by Danzig

without a doubt?

1-no
2-no
3-we might not ever be bestest buddies, but news like that doesn't help
4-i don't think we should give anyone foreign aid with the hope we are getting something in return. i think we should offer future aid IF they meet certain criteria first, which is what i wrote to my senator., they don't meet the criteria, they don't get the money. i don't think u.s. citizens who believe in equal rights for all should be footing the bill for countries who think half the population is less than human, undeserving of education, and shouldn't leave the house unless completely covered with only their eyes showing. there's a cleric in iraq who wants even one of the eyeholes covered! it's ridiculous.

#4 makes you a racist in the eyes of the left. Who are we to impose our ideals on sovereign nations they cry!! Of course we will be considered the the evil west if we cut funding to those poor downtrodden people (very few of which actually receive the intended aid, you know kinda like here)

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by Cannon Shell

#4 makes you a racist in the eyes of the left. Who are we to impose our ideals on sovereign nations they cry!! Of course we will be considered the the evil west if we cut funding to those poor downtrodden people (very few of which actually receive the intended aid, you know kinda like here)

i've been called worse. and no, much of the funding doesn't go where it was intended. kind of like how the u.n. oil for food program worked out. not very well from what i remember...

and no, we don't have to impose our ideals...we don't have to send money either. i just think we ought to get more bang for our buck. there for a while, afganistan was our #1 recipient of foreign aid-the last few years before we invaded after 9-11.

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by Danzig

i've been called worse. and no, much of the funding doesn't go where it was intended. kind of like how the u.n. oil for food program worked out. not very well from what i remember...

and no, we don't have to impose our ideals...we don't have to send money either. i just think we ought to get more bang for our buck. there for a while, afganistan was our #1 recipient of foreign aid-the last few years before we invaded after 9-11.

fact check


$10.4 billion: Amount of aid the United States pledged for development in Afghanistan from 2002 to 2008. The United States provides a third of all development aid to Afghanistan.

$5 billion: Amount of aid the United States has actually dispersed.

http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:...lnk&cd=1&gl=us


Meanwhile Isreal and Egypt both received

$16.76 billion and $11.44 billion respectively and that is only from 2001-2006(one year less)

http://www.vaughns-1-pagers.com/poli...oreign-aid.htm


http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7...362402,00.html