![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
These kinds of huge moves need to at least be explained.
Wolfson could come out and say this was a unique situation: "the horse was blah-blah-blah, so we did blah-blah-blah. It is a problem easy to miss in many horses and hard to correct but we accomplished it because of the aforementioned." And then add how talented the horses really are and the talent could now be displayed because of the unique spine realignment that was performed... blah. Something unique and legal... yes?...has this happened? Just saying its the same old same old... well he needed rest... that does not cut it. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm still confused. If these guys have such HUGE edges, why don't they work for ALL their horses? I seem to recollect that when Ferraiola claimed a horse it was MONEY 1st time out. Or Oscar, with those multiple wins in succession from the same horse. YET, Wolfson can't get a win out of the RAT Jelly Roll and goes down at 4:5 with Onoitsmymotherinlaw.
Shouldn't he at least get his money back for the juice used on these horses? I mean, there are certainly cases where JUICE DOESN'T WORK in sports, right? ![]() |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
why some horses responded to the new regimen, and the others, the new regimen was not used because nothing needed to be changed in the first place. They are performing as they should. So explain away please... |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|