|
|
 |
|
|
|
#1
01-29-2009, 03:56 PM
|
||||
|
||||
If Nadal gets past Verdasco tonight, which he should, the final is gonna be armageddon. I've maintained for a while that Nadal should have to win a hard court final before he's truly called #1. He owns the French and finally squeaked by Fed on grass, but he's never even made a final at either of the hard court slams, while Fed has won 8 of the last 10. If Nadal beats Fed on Sunday, I'll bow to him, but Fed will be out for blood. Won't be easy.
|
|
#2
01-30-2009, 03:22 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Wow, the Nadal-Verdasco match can't be beat. I watched it for the 1st 4 sets, and had to finally get some sleep. 2 pitbulls that were not gunna leave there without winning(really amazing, and Spain should be proud of the show they put on.)
|
|
#3
01-30-2009, 03:25 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
01-30-2009, 03:29 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Over 5 hours and one for the ages. Verdasco comes back at 0-40 to 30-40, only to lose with a double fault to lose. Hard to see Nadal having anything in the tank for Federer, but will be interesting to see.
What a classic...watch the last rwo sets. The had their longest rally in the last game. Quote:
__________________
Don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things.
|
|
#5
01-30-2009, 08:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm going to get about 5 hours sleep and set the alarm for this one. If it's half as good as Wimbledon then it'll be well worth it.
|
|
#6
01-30-2009, 09:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nadal has Tiger Woods type concentration
and competitiveness. Just not as talented imo. Should be a good match. I got to go with Federer.
|
|
#7
01-31-2009, 09:40 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Just a reminder that the Federer-Nadal war starts in 6 hours from now at the unfortunate time of 3:30 a.m. Eastern on ESPN2. Why they can't play it in the afternoon in Australia is beyond me.
|
|
#8
02-01-2009, 05:25 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
So far so good.
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
