![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
i appreciate your belittling of our service, sorry it doesn't fit your ideals. again, which branch are YOU in? and let your brother know i appreciate his service-i really do. i have a lot of respect for all our guys and gals in uniform. not very much for those who cheerlead from the sidelines, as tho being a relative of someone who is doing something means a damn thing. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Everyone loves to say we should fight this war or our military should be protecting people in Africa, but for some reason they don't like to sign up and fight them. Leave that to the guys in the military. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
again, when did you enlist? altho by now, with no answer, i figure you are not, and have never been, in the military. you'd have said so by now had you been. so, mr. judgemental, maybe you should take some of your bad advice and shut up about what the military should be doing. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
"A person who saw no important difference between the fire outside a Neandrathal's cave and a working thermo-nuclear reactor might tell you that junk bonds and derivatives BOTH serve to energize capital" - Nathan Israel |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
LOL....You all thought I was nuts? |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Early nom for 2009 post of the year ![]() |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
btw.....are you, like, 14yrs old or what? |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
My head hurts.
|
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Okay, I'm going to take an unususal step here and actually defend Quiet Chris.....a little bit. I certainly don't agree with a lot of the stuff the guy has had to say in this thread, but I think the idea of isolationism has at least some merit, and I don't exactly understand why so many Americans today - particularly Conservatives - scoff at the idea. Does isolationism mean that the U.S. should have no state department, or defense department? Of course not, but in the decades after WWII the United States has generally operated under the assumption that "my enemy's enemy is always my friend," and that the U.S. is always best served by intervening. How has that worked out? While it could be argued either way, there are certainly a LOT of negatives that have come out of this approach for both Americans and people around the world. How much did the U.S. involvement in Guatemala, Turkey, Greece, Afghanistan, Cuba, Korea, Vietnam, etc really have to do with "winning" the war against "Communism", or helping any American citizens? By most accounts, not much. How many people - both U.S. soldiers and civilians of those countries - died from those actions? By all accounts, a lot.
Before they were taken over by the neo-cons, the Republican Party used to be (and people like Ron Paul still are) a bastion of isolationism. Is the basic idea that the U.S. should NOT be the policemen of the world that insane? I don't think so. Personally I'm not an isolationist or an old-school conservative, but perhaps people that are those things simply deserve a better spokesperson than Quiet Chris. I do think strict isolationism is a reasonable foreign policy that makes cogent points which thoughtful and intelligent people could believe in. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|