Spa jockey/agent title race

Originally Posted by eurobounce

You have to also have ti factor in the number of mounts each is going to have at the end of the year. Prado will have many more mounts than Gomez. Predicting the difference then factoring in the win % will give you about 7-9 more wins for Gomez. Therefore giving him a 5-7 lead in wins. You have to look into the future my friend.

You are bad with stats, Gomez is 1% higher than prado at the meet, thats it.

[Rupert Pupkin]

Originally Posted by oracle80

You are bad with stats, Gomez is 1% higher than prado at the meet, thats it.

That is correct.

Originally Posted by oracle80

You are bad with stats, Gomez is 1% higher than prado at the meet, thats it.

That isnt the stat we are viewing Oracle--you are funny. That stat is based on the number of mounts vs number of wins. We are assuming that Gomez is riding at 20% clip based on his number of mounts. If you have him 25 more mounts (equals Prado) then he will have 5 more wins like Rupert has said. That would give him a 2 race lead. But what you have to take into account is the Prado will have more than 25 more mounts than Gomez. I predict that he will end up having 33-36 more mounts.

Originally Posted by eurobounce

That isnt the stat we are viewing Oracle--you are funny. That stat is based on the number of mounts vs number of wins. We are assuming that Gomez is riding at 20% clip based on his number of mounts. If you have him 25 more mounts (equals Prado) then he will have 5 more wins like Rupert has said. That would give him a 2 race lead. But what you have to take into account is the Prado will have more than 25 more mounts than Gomez. I predict that he will end up having 33-36 more mounts.

Thats where YOU are funny. I made the premise that Frieze was better at day to day hustling than anyone else, and you scoffed at it.

Originally Posted by oracle80

Thats where YOU are funny. I made the premise that Frieze was better at day to day hustling than anyone else, and you scoffed at it.

I didnt scoff at that fact. In fact, I dont think I disagreed with you either. I just said you would be touting Anderson/Prado before you would Frieze/Gomez.

Originally Posted by eurobounce

I didnt scoff at that fact. In fact, I dont think I disagreed with you either. I just said you would be touting Anderson/Prado before you would Frieze/Gomez.

Thats where you are wrong. If Gomez had frieze even three behind as he is now, I'd still bet Frieze. Nice to know you actually are a sick enough guy to think you know my thoughts better than me, lol.

Originally Posted by oracle80

Thats where you are wrong. If Gomez had frieze even three behind as he is now, I'd still bet Frieze. Nice to know you actually are a sick enough guy to think you know my thoughts better than me, lol.

Just going by the way you present yourself on this board.

[Rupert Pupkin]

Originally Posted by eurobounce

That isnt the stat we are viewing Oracle--you are funny. That stat is based on the number of mounts vs number of wins. We are assuming that Gomez is riding at 20% clip based on his number of mounts. If you have him 25 more mounts (equals Prado) then he will have 5 more wins like Rupert has said. That would give him a 2 race lead. But what you have to take into account is the Prado will have more than 25 more mounts than Gomez. I predict that he will end up having 33-36 more mounts.

We're not assuming that Gomez is riding at 20% based on his number of mounts. He is riding at a 20% clip, period. He has 20% winners this meet.