'Kill him'?

[MaTH716]

Originally Posted by dalakhani

I will answer your question and in turn I hope you will answer mine. Do you find it curious that this is suddenly a "big issue"? Do you think that you are in any way parroting the desperate McCain campaign that is throwing any mud that they can find because they know the election is virtually a lost cause? Do you really think Obama is a terrorist?

Now to answer your questions. Obama isnt the son of Admiral McCain or President HW Bush. He had to make his own way in the world and he had to start at the bottom. There are unsavory characters at every level the only difference is that the ones from the bottom actually go to jail.

Do I think he had heard his pastor say bad things? I do. I think Obama knew that Wright felt the way he does. Does it mean that obama feels this way? No, i dont think it does.

Do I think its a big deal about Ayers? No, i think its ridiculous.

That's fair, I was just curious what some Obama supporters thought about the alledged relationships.
As far as your questions goes. Of course I don't think he is a terrorist. As far as the republicans bringing it up now, of course it is a desperation play. It is very late in the game to be playing the muck game. But really what does McCain have to lose? I can't believe that it has taken so long to bring this up. I would have thought that Hilary would have touched on the subject a long time ago. Maybe it really is a non issue, or the media would have been all over right? Or is it just the liberal press. I think it is a little of both.
Bottom line is that people want a change. They see McCain being a republican and link him to GW (Obama has done a good job constantly linking the two). Obviously it is Obama's race to lose, but stranger things have happened and nothing would suprise me when Washington is involved.

[timmgirvan]

Originally Posted by MaTH716

That's fair, I was just curious what some Obama supporters thought about the alledged relationships.
As far as your questions goes. Of course I don't think he is a terrorist. As far as the republicans bringing it up now, of course it is a desperation play. It is very late in the game to be playing the muck game. But really what does McCain have to lose? I can't believe that it has taken so long to bring this up. I would have thought that Hilary would have touched on the subject a long time ago. Maybe it really is a non issue, or the media would have been all over right? Or is it just the liberal press. I think it is a little of both.
Bottom line is that people want a change. They see McCain being a republican and link him to GW (Obama has done a good job constantly linking the two). Obviously it is Obama's race to lose, but stranger things have happened and nothing would suprise me when Washington is involved.

Maybe Bill and Hillary have an 'October Surprise' coming?

[steve]

who was charles ketting and what is john mccain's relationship to him...or maybe his top advisers role with freddie mac!

[timmgirvan]

Originally Posted by steve

who was charles ketting and what is john mccain's relationship to him...or maybe his top advisers role with freddie mac!

Prosecutors in the Keating 5 scandal cleared McCain of any impropriety long ago....but it makes for good headlines. However, 3 of the guilty ones are serving on Nobamas' presidential staff!

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by timmgirvan

Prosecutors in the Keating 5 scandal cleared McCain of any impropriety long ago....but it makes for good headlines. However, 3 of the guilty ones are serving on Nobamas' presidential staff!

are you referring to the three former fannie mae execs??? if so...



http://www.factcheck.org/askfactchec..._economic.html

[prudery]

Originally Posted by MaTH716

That's fair, I was just curious what some Obama supporters thought about the alledged relationships.
As far as your questions goes. Of course I don't think he is a terrorist. As far as the republicans bringing it up now, of course it is a desperation play. It is very late in the game to be playing the muck game. But really what does McCain have to lose? I can't believe that it has taken so long to bring this up. I would have thought that Hilary would have touched on the subject a long time ago. Maybe it really is a non issue, or the media would have been all over right? Or is it just the liberal press. I think it is a little of both.
Bottom line is that people want a change. They see McCain being a republican and link him to GW (Obama has done a good job constantly linking the two). Obviously it is Obama's race to lose, but stranger things have happened and nothing would suprise me when Washington is involved.

Just as a relevant aside on theose sixties...

During the revolt/revolution/liberation heady days of the sixties, for some, it was like joining a club ...

--Only this club went against all most people's parents were for, and many traditions ...

It was new, exciting, full of questions, and MUCH beneficial came out of it, some of which we enjoy today ...

Though I shared a belief for change and improvement, and also LIKED where I lived, I did not join those clubs, though many people I knew did ...

I never bought into a violent revolution, but some did---as in the Chicago 7 ...

My boyfriend at the time, was a musician, film student and successful conscientious objecter .... Somewhat later he became a Jehovah's Witness, and now he is a conservative Republican, lover of George Bush ...

My association with him reflects none of the above ... And my current association with him is based on who he is today---a nice, bald, fat conservative Republican ...

I would suspect many of the Club revolutionaries and hippies I knew would be singularly embarrassed by their previous karmas ... The ex is not---he is somewhat the same guy, but with different values ...

I am confounded by Ayers' contemporary comments, but I feel that if he were a current threat to society, he would have been called out ...

Obama's associations with him were in today's educational arena working under the Annenberg umbrella under which there are Republican connections as well...

[Mortimer]

Originally Posted by prudery

Just as an irrelevant aside on those sixties...

During the revolt/revolution/liberation heady days of the sixties, for some, it was like joining a club ...

--Only this club went against all most people's parents were for, and many traditions ...like sex outside the office and highly stimulating dope rather than sissy scotch.

It was new, exciting, full of questions, and MUCH beneficial came out of it, some of which we enjoy today ...like sex outside the office and highly stimulating dope rather then sissy scotch.

Though I shared a belief for change and improvement, and also LOVED sex outside the office, I did not join those clubs, though I LOVE sex outside the office,many people I knew did ...

I never bought into a violent revolution, but some did---as in the Chicago 7 and Bill Hartack.

My boyfriend at the time, was a plummah, ne'er-do-well and successful conscientious objecter when it suited him. He never objected to sex outside the office. .... Somewhat later he became a Government Witness, and now he is on the run from LCN....

My association with him reflects none of the above ( ?? )... And my current association with him is based on who he is today---a nice, bald, fat dumbazz on the run. Good riddance to him. ...

I would suspect many of the Club revolutionaries and hippies I knew would be singularly embarrassed by their previous
Krishna-Krishna, Hari Rum Na's ... The ex is not---he is somewhat the same guy, but with different values ......ie....he doesn't have any.....

I am confounded by Ayers' contemporary comments, but I feel that if he were a current threat to society, he would have been shot ...

Obama's associations with him were in today's educational arena working under the Annenberg umbrella under which there are Republican connections as well......oh ah dunno

=:>

[prudery]

Originally Posted by Mortimer

=:>

I think I need to get the cold water out---old yenta remedy ...

Stop editing me in lieu of something else ...

I looooved Bill Hartack...

[Mortimer]

wok good


stop yelling at me


My uncle said he was swine...but that's just him.

[prudery]

Originally Posted by Mortimer

wok good


stop yelling at me


My uncle said he was swine...but that's just him.

The tongue is an unruly member, but silence poisons the soul ...

Sweet nothings ...

[Mortimer]

Originally Posted by prudery

The tongue is an unruly member, but silence poisons the soul ...

Sweet nothings ...

Oh Yes...I would agree.














( )

[hi_im_god]

Originally Posted by MaTH716

That's fair, I was just curious what some Obama supporters thought about the alledged relationships.
As far as your questions goes. Of course I don't think he is a terrorist. As far as the republicans bringing it up now, of course it is a desperation play. It is very late in the game to be playing the muck game. But really what does McCain have to lose? I can't believe that it has taken so long to bring this up. I would have thought that Hilary would have touched on the subject a long time ago. Maybe it really is a non issue, or the media would have been all over right? Or is it just the liberal press. I think it is a little of both.
Bottom line is that people want a change. They see McCain being a republican and link him to GW (Obama has done a good job constantly linking the two). Obviously it is Obama's race to lose, but stranger things have happened and nothing would suprise me when Washington is involved.

it's a ploy that appeals to the unemployed, inebriated, wife beating, couch potato republican base which may be concerned about obama's judgement.

looking at other posts here, it's working.

[prudery]

Originally Posted by hi_im_god

it's a ploy that appeals to the unemployed, inebriated, wife beating, couch potato republican base which may be concerned about obama's judgement.

looking at other posts here, it's working.

Not as well as some hoped ... TFG ...

[steve]

why even be associated with keating who cost alot of people money. isn't this the same indisquestion(?) that obama is beingheld to

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by hi_im_god

it's a ploy that appeals to the unemployed, inebriated, wife beating, couch potato republican base which may be concerned about obama's judgement.

looking at other posts here, it's working.

i thought the republican base was the ultra right wing religious zealot?


and we wonder why our pols can't work together. all these stereotypes being flung about....but we expect our govt, which is made up of our fellow citizens, to rise above all of this?