![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all. Abraham Lincoln |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
As hard as it is for me to say this, this is 100% the correct decision
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't get it.
If the BC was the ultimate aim, why 'risk' running in SUF if the horse needs extra time between races? And, given the EASY time of it he had at SUF, why the extra time to recover? Here's a case where a horse (physically) bounced. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Clearly they need to add a 9f race.
They probably need a 10f one for the fillies too. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Commentator = Lava Man?
Just see a lot of similar qualities, while good horses, despite their records I never felt either falls into the great category. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Lava Man couldn't compete outside of Southern California. Commentator has run huge races at Saratoga, Belmont, Keeneland, Churchill and Suffolk. Now, Lava Man ran some very nice races, none as fast as quite a few Commentator ran, and Commentator has run fast races at more than a few distances, thus I just don't see the comparison.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Lava Man is a perfect example of why many beleive that Cali racing is just not up to par with the east coast. The funny thing with LM is that his trainer seems to have a real niche for shipping east to pick up graded stakes. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
They've never been in the same league, and as for the rest of your post, I really don't see similarities. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Now, I don't think that's totally fair, as on his homecourt, Lava Man was vary good. But on raw talent? It's probably not that close.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|