Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Sports Bar & Grill
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-29-2008, 12:37 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,943
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ddthetide
which job is worse the Raiders or Rams? the rams are a bad team but the working conditions in oakland must be awful and they are a bad team.
i'd say raiders.
haslett named interim coach for the rams.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-29-2008, 02:11 PM
jwkniska's Avatar
jwkniska jwkniska is offline
Fairgrounds
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Mt. Prospect, IL (AP)
Posts: 1,578
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig
i'd say raiders.
haslett named interim coach for the rams.
I agree. At least in STL, you don't have to put up with Al Davis.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-29-2008, 02:42 PM
dalakhani's Avatar
dalakhani dalakhani is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Washington dc
Posts: 5,277
Default

I think the Raiders can be better faster. The rams are a complete rebuild that might get closer to "average" faster but a long, long way from being good.

The Raiders have a young QB, a potentially franchise RB behind a young and improving line.

On the defensive side, they have a ball hawking secondary and a defense that can make plays.

St Louis has an aging line and a QB that has seen his better days. If I were them, I would consider trading Jackson for a package. He is the only one still worth anything. Holt is still good but at his age you wouldnt get much in the way of a trade.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-29-2008, 02:45 PM
GPK GPK is offline
5'8".. but all man!
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 3 miles from Chateuax de la Blaha
Posts: 21,706
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dalakhani
I think the Raiders can be better faster. The rams are a complete rebuild that might get closer to "average" faster but a long, long way from being good.

The Raiders have a young QB, a potentially franchise RB behind a young and improving line.

On the defensive side, they have a ball hawking secondary and a defense that can make plays.

St Louis has an aging line and a QB that has seen his better days. If I were them, I would consider trading Jackson for a package. He is the only one still worth anything. Holt is still good but at his age you wouldnt get much in the way of a trade.

Green or Bulger?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-29-2008, 02:51 PM
dalakhani's Avatar
dalakhani dalakhani is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Washington dc
Posts: 5,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GPK
Green or Bulger?
Both. Green is just flat done. Bulger is 31 and has gotten killed behind that line over the last couple of seasons. I think he can still be a decent NFL QB but he won't have the years he had a few years back. I would say to trade him but you can't get any value for him (maybe a midround?).

What do you think?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-29-2008, 02:53 PM
SniperSB23 SniperSB23 is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 6,086
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dalakhani
Both. Green is just flat done. Bulger is 31 and has gotten killed behind that line over the last couple of seasons. I think he can still be a decent NFL QB but he won't have the years he had a few years back. I would say to trade him but you can't get any value for him (maybe a midround?).

What do you think?
Bulger can still be effective, they need to repair the line before anyone is taking them anywhere though. Green needs to get out of there quick. He is a mortality waiting to happen behind that line.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-29-2008, 04:04 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,943
Default

nothing wrong with bulger. he'd have more trade value at that age than a running back-31 isn't exactly old for a QB. but regardless of his talent level, he won't do squat without an O-line to give him time in the pocket. he's one of the few bright spots on an otherwise horrid team. the decision to bench him is probably what cost that coach his job. you don't give a guy a contract like that and then hand him headphones. it was a bonehead move. but while they're firing, they need to look at the gm as well.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-29-2008, 04:06 PM
GPK GPK is offline
5'8".. but all man!
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 3 miles from Chateuax de la Blaha
Posts: 21,706
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dalakhani
Both. Green is just flat done. Bulger is 31 and has gotten killed behind that line over the last couple of seasons. I think he can still be a decent NFL QB but he won't have the years he had a few years back. I would say to trade him but you can't get any value for him (maybe a midround?).

What do you think?

Obviously alot depends on his past shoulder issues...but the overall state of that Rams team makes it virtually impossible for any QB to be succesful. I think he has a few good years left in him...just would like to see it with a different team.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-29-2008, 05:45 PM
declansharbor's Avatar
declansharbor declansharbor is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Exit 30
Posts: 6,357
Default

The Rams have arguably the worst defense in the game. This is the main root(one of many roots with Oline not far behind) of the problem. Vince Lombardi couldnt even make a difference with the talent Linehan had. Their coverage in secondary is atrocious. They picked up one piece of the puzzle in Chris Long, and will probably focus the next few drafts and offseasons on Oline and defensive help. It all starts up front. (something I never believed in until about 5 years ago) If they don't find the 'stop-gaps' soon, expect a carousel of head coaches to be shown the exit doors in the upcoming years.
__________________
"A person who saw no important difference between the fire outside a Neandrathal's cave and a working thermo-nuclear reactor might tell you that junk bonds and derivatives BOTH serve to energize capital"

- Nathan Israel
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.