Goodbye Duante

[The Indomitable DrugS]

Originally Posted by dalakhani

The Vikings ranked fourth in total offense in 2004 while defense ranked 26th. Again, lets not let FACTS get in the way of an offbased position.

Yes - he managed to hit wide open guys underneath all year long in route to an 8-8 season. You should quit while you're behind.

Originally Posted by dalakhani

At the same time, Culpepper had a few GREAT YEARS. Regardless of how great Moss is, Daunte still had to deliver. In 2004 he did. And the leading receiver yards wise was Nate Burleson.

It was probably this kind of thinking that led to Culpepper destroying all of the fantasy football teams who drafted him in 2005 when he couldn't get out of his own way.

Nate Burleson? He was the Wes Welker of that offense! Feasting on linebackers and safteys in one on one coverage. How has Nate been doing lately?

[dalakhani]

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS

Yes - he managed to hit wide open guys underneath all year long in route to an 8-8 season. You should quit while you're behind.

Tell me the indomitable DrugS doesnt need this style of theatrics when called out for a bad, indefensible position. Say it aint so. "you should quit while you are behind"? LOL. You are better than this drugS.



It was probably this kind of thinking that led to Culpepper destroying all of the fantasy football teams who drafted him in 2005 when he couldn't get out of his own way.

Nate Burleson? He was the Wes Welker of that offense! Feasting on linebackers and safteys in one on one coverage. How has Nate been doing lately?

Nate Burleson had 9 tds last season. I think that lead his team...a playoff team.

[The Indomitable DrugS]

Originally Posted by dalakhani

Nate Burleson had 9 tds last season. I think that lead his team...a playoff team.

Spin away.

Since you are such a stats queen. Here you go with Nate's carrer stats:

year -- team -- games --catches -- yards -- TD's
2003 ---MIN------16------ 29 -------455 ----2
2004 ---MIN------16 ------68 ------1,006--- 9
2005 -- MIN ----- 12------ 30 -------328--- 1
2006 -- SEA------ 16 ----- 18 -------192---- 2
2007--- SEA----- 16------ 50 --------694 ---9

So much for that angle.

[dalakhani]

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS

Spin away.

Since you are such a stats queen. Here you go with Nate's carrer stats:

year -- team -- games --catches -- yards -- TD's
2003 ---MIN------16------ 29 -------455 ----2
2004 ---MIN------16 ------68 ------1,006--- 9
2005 -- MIN ----- 12------ 30 -------328--- 1
2006 -- SEA------ 16 ----- 18 -------192---- 2
2007--- SEA----- 16------ 50 --------694 ---9

So much for that angle.

No one said Nate Burleson was "great"...but he did have a good season last year. And go figure...Randy Moss was playing on another team. Perhaps with your six degrees of Moss seperation you can figure out a way Moss helped him catch those 9 tds and 700 yards.

You asked what Burleson was doing lately and i told you. So much for that angle. LOL

[hoovesupsideyourhead]

agree dante was mostly a bust..he should have stayed in chi town and been a star..