![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Was she given a fair chance to prove she was the best horse? Again...Im just asking, as I had nothing invested in the race. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Either did I. . . but just in general, I'd like the stewards to take a hands-off approach.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Like to hear from some others on this too.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
I had a small exacta 1-6 and I hated to see the 6 bounce off the 1. but I knew the stewards weren't going to touch it. They seem to be fairly consistant. The 9 and 10 weren't affected, the 1 had every chance to get it back together, 6 was the best horse, what could they do?
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm only defending today's call. I didn't see Birds.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
I could argue that this decision, standing alone, was fair.
Viewed in the context of the DQs of Proud Spell and Admiral Bird in the last week, this decision was laughable. I'm not sure that Spa Princess had the opportunity to prove that she was the third best horse in the race (as the bumping certainly could have cost her the length she was beaten for third), and the difference for the owners between third and fourth is $2,300. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Eventually one of the Desert Warrior's will get his first black type. Could be her.
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Is that nice? Rodrigo is a friend of mine. I assume you know him. By the way, I don't see how you can compare this to the Admiral Bird DQ, where there was a blanket finish, and this seemed like a good no-call.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|