Gotta love this broad

[FGFan]

Originally Posted by stonegossard

Board bully? Too funny. Because I disagree with you I am now a bully. I do post whats on my mind and dont sugarcoat things...big difference between that and a bully. As far as the game? I dont complain more than anyone else out there. If you are content with the current situation of horse racing (drugs...etc) then so be it. I think owners like Maggi Moss who continue to use questionable trainers are not good for the game. I dont see how any real horse racing fan could applaud someone like that. As far as her little horsey farm...IEAH is doin something very similar...does that make them good for the game? I said in my posts its ridiculous that she defends guys like DUtrow and Assmussen (as she did today)...not sure why you keep twisting around what I say.

If you dont like my posts fine...then dont bother with your rather ignorant posts to me. Funny how someone who ignores my posts knows so much about me.

Why would you call it my rumor board? Last time I checked I am not the one on here with the inside info posting rumors. In fact I NEVER post things I hear from people in the business. You seem like a very confused individual.

No not confused, I learned early on you pretty much argue with everybody over anything, so I skim over your mostly rude posts. For the most part all you seem to do is call people idiots and morons, trying to be a self appointed bully, not because you disagree with me. I could care less if you disagree with me. And seriously you are not funny, well maybe once in awhile, but there are far better comedians here than you, so spare us.

How comical you think my posts to you are ignorant. I just adopted and adapted your mode of posting.
Obviously you don't like being spoken to the way you speak to others. Isn't that called whining?

So lets get the record strait, maybe you should sharpen your reading skills...I said I neither liked nor disliked Maggi Moss. My opinion of her is not going to change anything, she will still have horses that I will bet on or against.

What I said was that you relayed information of an interview as if it was fact when your statements were false, gee I would call that rumor. Just like Amoss having a positive over a "feeling".
Obviously it was your perception of it which of course is fine, but don't represent it as the facts. There are casual readers that don't have access to HRTV and would take your synopsis as the truth when in fact it was not. Leading to....RUMORS!!!

I also never said I applaud them. Again you've missed the point. As stated by her today, that TX has zero tolerance therefore no commission to go to appeal therefore it has to go to court. In other juridsticions you can take it to an appeals board. I never said you post things from people in the business. So who is twisting what here....

Oh and there is little difference from the way you post your opinions and not sugarcoating..you come off as an idiot, moron(words you use when addressing others) bully.

[stonegossard]

Originally Posted by FGFan

No not confused, I learned early on you pretty much argue with everybody over anything, so I skim over your mostly rude posts. For the most part all you seem to do is call people idiots and morons, trying to be a self appointed bully, not because you disagree with me. I could care less if you disagree with me. And seriously you are not funny, well maybe once in awhile, but there are far better comedians here than you, so spare us.

How comical you think my posts to you are ignorant. I just adopted and adapted your mode of posting.
Obviously you don't like being spoken to the way you speak to others. Isn't that called whining?

So lets get the record strait, maybe you should sharpen your reading skills...I said I neither liked nor disliked Maggi Moss. My opinion of her is not going to change anything, she will still have horses that I will bet on or against.

What I said was that you relayed information of an interview as if it was fact when your statements were false, gee I would call that rumor. Just like Amoss having a positive over a "feeling".
Obviously it was your perception of it which of course is fine, but don't represent it as the facts. There are casual readers that don't have access to HRTV and would take your synopsis as the truth when in fact it was not. Leading to....RUMORS!!!

I also never said I applaud them. Again you've missed the point. As stated by her today, that TX has zero tolerance therefore no commission to go to appeal therefore it has to go to court. In other juridsticions you can take it to an appeals board. I never said you post things from people in the business. So who is twisting what here....

Oh and there is little difference from the way you post your opinions and not sugarcoating..you come off as an idiot, moron(words you use when addressing others) bully.

I love how since I dont agree with you I missed the point. Your ignorance continues to show. Moss said on tv that the problem is much bigger than Dutrow and Assmussen and we should basically look past them. She blames the states and their testing policies. Maybe you get a different version of HRTV. That is a crock of sh#t. These guys know the rules and bend them ALL the time.


Oh yeah....you might want to check the definition of the word rumor in your dictionary. You seemed to be very confused on what it means.

[FGFan]

Originally Posted by stonegossard

I love how since I dont agree with you I missed the point. Your ignorance continues to show. Moss said on tv that the problem is much bigger than Dutrow and Assmussen and we should basically look past them. She blames the states and their testing policies. Maybe you get a different version of HRTV. That is a crock of sh#t. These guys know the rules and bend them ALL the time.


Oh yeah....you might want to check the definition of the word rumor in your dictionary. You seemed to be very confused on what it means.

You still keeping missing the point...don't know what to say to that.

Let me try one more time....maybe if I put it in a different color....
My issue was with the FALSE information, your thoughts, you posted as if it was fact.
How much clearer can I make it. It has nothing to do with what you or I think of Maggi Moss, Assmussen or Dutrow. It has to do with you stating your opinions as fact.
Then of course you have to get all "looney" as if you just came out of the 'bin" and got all defensive.
I never said I condoned anything that was said or done.., I never defended their practices....well I did the new horse foundation for injured horses, hard to hate on that, but I'm sure you will.
You seem to think I disagree with your perception of them, when actually you wouldn't know any better because you got defensive. I actually never disagreed with you, I just said your portrayal of the interview was not factual.


I think you need this definition more than I do.
Rumor

n.

1. A piece of unverified information of uncertain origin usually spread by word of mouth.
2. Unverified information received from another; hearsay.

You just didn't like I verified what you said was not the truth it was just your opinion of an interview, so now you have to call me names.

I get it, you just think by calling people names they will concede to your opinion. You just like to argue and hate on people, boards, horses, owners, trainers.
Why do you play the game if you hate everything about it?

Let me ask you this, when betting do you use any of your hated trainers/owners horses? If not good for you, if so then you are a hypocrite.

And as far as Moss, well he also said that lasix has no benefits, to which Peter Lurrie responded they had a horse that bled and put it on lasix and it doesn't bleed. Moss had no repsonse.

Can you ever have a discussion without calling people names that dont' agree with you?
Maybe I shouldn't have asked you questions because you will carry on your usual mode of operation and call me names.

[stonegossard]

Originally Posted by FGFan

You still keeping missing the point...don't know what to say to that.

Let me try one more time....maybe if I put it in a different color....
My issue was with the FALSE information, your thoughts, you posted as if it was fact.
How much clearer can I make it. It has nothing to do with what you or I think of Maggi Moss, Assmussen or Dutrow. It has to do with you stating your opinions as fact.
Then of course you have to get all "looney" as if you just came out of the 'bin" and got all defensive.
I never said I condoned anything that was said or done.., I never defended their practices....well I did the new horse foundation for injured horses, hard to hate on that, but I'm sure you will.
You seem to think I disagree with your perception of them, when actually you wouldn't know any better because you got defensive. I actually never disagreed with you, I just said your portrayal of the interview was not factual.


I think you need this definition more than I do.
Rumor

n.

1. A piece of unverified information of uncertain origin usually spread by word of mouth.
2. Unverified information received from another; hearsay.

You just didn't like I verified what you said was not the truth it was just your opinion of an interview, so now you have to call me names.

I get it, you just think by calling people names they will concede to your opinion. You just like to argue and hate on people, boards, horses, owners, trainers.
Why do you play the game if you hate everything about it?

Let me ask you this, when betting do you use any of your hated trainers/owners horses? If not good for you, if so then you are a hypocrite.

And as far as Moss, well he also said that lasix has no benefits, to which Peter Lurrie responded they had a horse that bled and put it on lasix and it doesn't bleed. Moss had no repsonse.

Can you ever have a discussion without calling people names that dont' agree with you?
Maybe I shouldn't have asked you questions because you will carry on your usual mode of operation and call me names.

Obviously you and I saw the show and interpretted what SHE said much differently. Nothing I posted was false. It's funny how you disagree with something I post and call it false.

I think that if Moss builds a center to help old/injured horses thats great. Really. But that wont do a damn thing to help the game. She will be trying to fix a problem after the fact. Maybe if she didnt employ the trainers that end up hurting these horses, there wouldnt be a need for such a center.

Again you seem very offended with the way I post. I am sorry you dont like how I post....and seem to know a lot about me. When did I say I hate the game so much. Been following it for 23 yrs. You seem to be implying something which isnt true. Maybe I should start a thread about you spreading riumors about me? And please explain to me how betting on a trainer like Lake is being a hypocrite. Thats too damn funny. Also beyond a pathetic example. Seriously....think before you post some of this nonsense. Or maybe in your best interest just ignore me.

[FGFan]

Originally Posted by stonegossard

Obviously you and I saw the show and interpretted what SHE said much differently. Nothing I posted was false. It's funny how you disagree with something I post and call it false.

I think that if Moss builds a center to help old/injured horses thats great. Really. But that wont do a damn thing to help the game. She will be trying to fix a problem after the fact. Maybe if she didnt employ the trainers that end up hurting these horses, there wouldnt be a need for such a center.

Again you seem very offended with the way I post. I am sorry you dont like how I post....and seem to know a lot about me. When did I say I hate the game so much. Been following it for 23 yrs. You seem to be implying something which isnt true. Maybe I should start a thread about you spreading riumors about me? And please explain to me how betting on a trainer like Lake is being a hypocrite. Thats too damn funny. Also beyond a pathetic example. Seriously....think before you post some of this nonsense. Or maybe in your best interest just ignore me.

Oh now what, is that supposed to be some kind of cyber threat?

Frankly I don't know anything about you other than what you post here of which is almost always rude and antagonistic, that's why I generally skip over your posts.
I also knew you couldn't respond without calling me, or anyone else you disagree with, names.

As far as being offended by your posts, no not at all, I just think it's rude, ridiculous, and here's your favorite word..PATHETIC. If you did have something worthwhile to say it gets lost in all your nasty comments. If your attempting to be funny, it's not, leave it to the real board comedians.

You still don't get it, your opinions, your interpertation, are not a factual rendetion of that interview. That's all I was saying, but apparently you cannot understand that. It's pointless to try to explain anything to you I'd have better results talking to a brick wall. You can have the last word, I've lost interest.

[stonegossard]

Originally Posted by FGFan

Oh now what, is that supposed to be some kind of cyber threat?

Frankly I don't know anything about you other than what you post here of which is almost always rude and antagonistic, that's why I generally skip over your posts.
I also knew you couldn't respond without calling me, or anyone else you disagree with, names.

As far as being offended by your posts, no not at all, I just think it's rude, ridiculous, and here's your favorite word..PATHETIC. If you did have something worthwhile to say it gets lost in all your nasty comments. If your attempting to be funny, it's not, leave it to the real board comedians.

You still don't get it, your opinions, your interpertation, are not a factual rendetion of that interview. That's all I was saying, but apparently you cannot understand that. It's pointless to try to explain anything to you I'd have better results talking to a brick wall. You can have the last word, I've lost interest.

Now I am threatening you. Do you know how to read and what certain words mean when grouped together in a sentence ? I said it's probably best to ignore me seeing how I obviosuly offend you. Perhaps you need some reading lessons. You continually take what I say and twist it into something different. It's funny how you continue to insult me and toss names at me, but I am the bully. I really put you on tilt huh?

A two page, soon to be three page thread on Maggi Moss that's turned serious in nature. Sickening.